Analysis of road safety trends in Sweden 2017 Khabat Amin, Swedish Transport Agency Anna Vadeby, VTI Matteo Rizzi, Swedish Transport Administration 1
Swedish road safety indicators Indicator Required development for 2020 targets Number of fatalities in line Number of seriously injured in line 1. Speed, state road network not in line 2. Speed, municipal road network not in line 3. Sober traffic not in line 4. Use of seat belts in line 5a. Use of bicycle helmets not in line 5b. Use of moped helmets in line 6. Safe passenger cars in line 7. Increase in regulatory compliance motorcycle not measured yet 8. Safe state roads not in line 9. Safe pedestrian & bicycle crossings in line 10. Maintenance of cycle roads not in line 11. Systematic road safety work ISO 39001 not measured yet 2
In line Number of fatalities 2017 3
Fatalities in road traffic accidents in Sweden 2006 2017 with required development until 2020 Fatalities Target 2020 Suicide EU target 2020 4
Road fatalities per 100 000 inhabitants Norway Norge 2017 Sweden Sverige 2017 Norway Norge 2016 Sweden Sverige 2016 Storbritannien Great Britain 2,1 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,8 Denmark Danmark Germany Tyskland 3,7 3,9 EU 28 EU 28 Australia Australien 5,1 5,4 USA USA 11,6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 5
Number of fatalities by road user category in Sweden 2006 2017 car driver car pass motorcyclist mopedist cyclist pedestrian 6
In line Number of seriously injured 2017 7
Number of seriously injured in Sweden 2006-2017 with required development until 2020 (incl./excl. pedestrian falls) Seriously injured (excluding ped falls) Target 2020 Seriously injured (including ped falls) 8
Number of seriously injured by road user category in Sweden 2006-2017 pedestrian car occupant cyclist mopedist motorcyclist other 9
Not in line State and municipal speed compliance 10
Share of traffic volume within speed limits on state road network 1996 2004 and 2012 2017 with required development until 2020 % Share within speed limit Target 2020 11
Average travel speeds on state road network 1996 2004 and 2012 2016 with required development until 2020 Km/h Average travel speed Target 2020 12
Number of speed violations manually reported by the Police and by automatic speed cameras 2007 2017 Manual reporting Automatic speed camera 13
Share of traffic volume within speed limits on the municipal road network 2012 2017 with required development until 2020 % Share within speed limit Target 2020 14
Average travel speed on municipal road network 2012 2017 with required development until 2020 Km/h Average travel speed Target 2020 15
Not in line Sober drivers 16
Share of traffic volume with sober drivers 2007 2017 with required development until 2020 % Share of sober drivers Target 2020 17
Number and share of fatalities in alcohol and/or drugrelated accidents 2008 2017 n % Alcohol Illegal drugs Alcohol and illegal drugs Share of all road fatalities (right Y-axel) 18
Number of breathalyser tests (million) Number of reported drunk drivers Number of breathalyser tests and number of reported intoxicated drivers 2001 2017 Breathalyser tests Reported drunk drivers 19
In line Seat belt use 20
Share of restrained drivers / front seat car passengers 1997 2017 with required development until 2020 % Seat belt use in the front seats Target 2020 21
Seat belt use in passenger cars and HGVs 2003 2017 % Car driver Taxi driver HGV w/ trailer Car, adult front seat pass Car, adult rear seats Car, children rear seats HGV w/o trailer 22
Not in line Bicycle helmet use 23
Share of cyclists wearing bicycle helmets 1996 2017 with required development until 2020 % Bicycle helmet use Target 2020 24
Use of bicycle helmets for different age groups 1996-2017 % Children, residential area Children, to/from school Adults, to/from work Adults, bicycle paths 25
In line Moped helmet use 26
Share of moped riders wearing helmets 2012 2017 with required development until year 2020 % Helmet use among moped riders Target 2020 27
In line Safe passenger cars 28
Share of traffic volume with highest crashworthiness rating in Euro NCAP 2000 2017 with required development until 2020 % Highest crashworthiness rating Euro NCAP Target 2020 29
Share of traffic volume with SBR, ESC and low-speed AEB 2000-2017 with forecast until 2025 % SBR front seats SBR front seats forecast 2025 AEB low speed AEB low speed forecast 2025 ESC ESC forecast 2025 30
Not measured yet Motorcycle regulatory compliance 31
Definition of the correct use of motorcycles Helmeted Sober (no alcohol or illegal drugs) Valid driving license for motorcycle Follow the speed limit Drive appropriately no wheelies or other reckless riding 32
Share of correct use of motorcycles in motorcycle fatal accidents 2005 2017 % Correct use Unknown 33
Motorcycle fatal accidents 2005-2017 57% of cases: at least one of the following violations not wearing a helmet driving under influence of alcohol or drugs no valid license for motorcycle driving at least 30 km/h above speed limit 1% of cases: drunk, unlicensed driver driving at least 30 km/h above the speed limit without helmet 19% of cases: the only violation was driving at least 30 km/h above speed limit 34
Not in line Safe state roads 35
Share of traffic volume on state roads with speed limits above 80 km/h with median barriers 1996 2017 with required development until 2020 Median barriers Target 2020 36
In line Safe pedestrian and bicycle crossings 37
Share of pedestrian and bicycle crossings of good quality 2013 2017 with required development until 2020 Safe crossings Target 2020 38
Not in line Maintenance of bicycle paths 39
Share of municipalities with good maintenance of prioritized bicycle paths with required development until 2020 Municipalities with good maintenance of prioritized bicycle paths Target 2020 40
Not measured yet Systematic road safety work 41
Systematic road safety work in line with ISO 39001 Management standard for road safety : ISO 39001 A voluntary tool for any organization that affects or is affected by road safety Road safety policy, interim goals and action plans 42
Present situation of road safety in Sweden 2017 Indicator Starting point 2017 2020 target Number of fatalities 440 253 220 Number of seriously injured 5 400 4 400 4 100 1. Speed, state road network 43 % 45 % 80 % 2. Speed, municipal road network 64 % (2012) 67 % 80 % 3. Sober traffic 99,71% 99,74 % 99,90 % 4. Use of seat belts 96 % 98 % 99 % 5a. Use of cycle helmets 27 % 44 % 70 % 5b. Use of moped helmets 96 % 98 % 99 % 6. Safe passenger cars 20 % 72 % 80 % 7. Increase in regulatory compliance motorcycle - - no set target yet 8. Safe state roads 50 % 76 % 90 % 9. Safe pedestrian & bicycle crossings 19 % 27 % 35 % 10. Maintenance of cycle paths 18 % 36 % 70 % 11. Systematic road safety work ISO 39001 - - no set target yet 43
Summary Sweden 2017 The number of fatalities and severely injured decreased lowest number of fatalities since the 40's But, several warning signals speed compliance and sober drivers median barriers on state roads seriously injured cyclists Rapid action is needed if the 2020 target is to be achieved with systematic road safety work 44
TMALL 0141 Presentation v 1.0 Några exempel på projekt/åtgärder Eva Lundberg, Trafikverket
Några exempel på projekt/åtgärder - Sverige Geofencing Uppföljning hastighetsefterlevnad taxi Pilotförsök Aktivt farthinder statligt vägnät NYKTRA-Projektet 46
Geofencing Handskakning mellan fordonsindustrin, städer och myndighet att gemensamt kraftsamla kring hur digitaliseringens möjligheter kan bidra till säkrare och attraktivare stadsmiljöer Trafikverket regeringsuppdrag att testa geofencing i demonstrationsprojekt i urban miljö 47
Handlingsplan geofencing - fokus Säkra max hastighet Zonaccess Villkora fossilfritt drivmedel i zoner Nyttotrafik Frivilligt till villkorat system Statiska och dynamiska zoner Handlingsplan implementering år 2019..2025. 48
Uppföljning hastighetsefterlevnad taxi Trafikrytm - Näringslivet förväntas bidra Yrkesförare har stora möjligheter att påverka såväl trafikrytm som hastighetsefterlevnad hos övriga trafikanter. Ett samarbete mellan Polisen, Trafikverket, Transportstyrelsen och VTI Studie: Taxiföretags hastighetsefterlevnad Hastighetsmätningar på motorväg med laser under april juni 2017 i Stockholm och Göteborg. Vilken egenkontroll finns? 49
E4 Arlanda Stockholm uppmätta hastigheter för taxibilar. 80 km/tim 100 km/tim 50
Sammanfattning Både taxiförare och vanliga personbilsförare är dåliga på att hålla hastighetsgränsen, men efterlevnaden hos taxi är sämre Det är små skillnader mellan olika taxibolag Taxi bidrar till att dra upp hastighetsnivåerna Företag som arbetar systematiskt och långsiktigt med hastighetsfrågan når bättre resultat Det behövs egenkontroll Taxiförare förväntas vara ett föredöme i trafiken 51
Pilotförsök Aktivt farthinder statligt vägnät Var finns de idag och vilka är effekterna? Kommunalt vägnät Hastigheten sjunker Bullernivån har sjunkit. Markvibrationerna ligger under gränsen för måttlig störning Topphastigheterna har sjunkit. Andelen bilister som väjer för gående har ökat. Pilotförsök på tre platser på statligt vägnät E65 Dragongatan, Ystad, första platsen 52
NYKTRA-projektet Gemensamt projekt mellan Trafikverket och Polisen Avsiktsförklaring tecknad mellan myndighetschefer april 2017 Ett nytt koncept för att kontrollera nykterhet och förebygga onykterhet i trafiken Konceptet ska möjliggör rättssäkra och automatiserade nykterhetskontroller i vägtrafikmiljön och vara utformat på ett sådant sätt att det krävs en begränsad närvaro av poliser och/eller representanter från andra kontrollmyndigheter Projektet påbörjas 2017 och avslutas 2021 53