Analysis of road safety trends in Sweden Khabat Amin, Swedish Transport Agency Anna Vadeby, VTI Matteo Rizzi, Swedish Transport Administration

Storlek: px

Starta visningen från sidan:

Download "Analysis of road safety trends in Sweden Khabat Amin, Swedish Transport Agency Anna Vadeby, VTI Matteo Rizzi, Swedish Transport Administration"

Carl-Johan Vikström
för 5 år sedan
Visningar:

1 Analysis of road safety trends in Sweden 2017 Khabat Amin, Swedish Transport Agency Anna Vadeby, VTI Matteo Rizzi, Swedish Transport Administration 1

2 Swedish road safety indicators Indicator Required development for 2020 targets Number of fatalities in line Number of seriously injured in line 1. Speed, state road network not in line 2. Speed, municipal road network not in line 3. Sober traffic not in line 4. Use of seat belts in line 5a. Use of bicycle helmets not in line 5b. Use of moped helmets in line 6. Safe passenger cars in line 7. Increase in regulatory compliance motorcycle not measured yet 8. Safe state roads not in line 9. Safe pedestrian & bicycle crossings in line 10. Maintenance of cycle roads not in line 11. Systematic road safety work ISO not measured yet 2

3 In line Number of fatalities

Fatalities in road traffic accidents in Sweden 2006 2017 with required

4 Fatalities in road traffic accidents in Sweden with required development until 2020 Fatalities Target 2020 Suicide EU target

5 Road fatalities per inhabitants Norway Norge 2017 Sweden Sverige 2017 Norway Norge 2016 Sweden Sverige 2016 Storbritannien Great Britain 2,1 2,5 2,6 2,7 2,8 Denmark Danmark Germany Tyskland 3,7 3,9 EU 28 EU 28 Australia Australien 5,1 5,4 USA USA 11,

6 Number of fatalities by road user category in Sweden car driver car pass motorcyclist mopedist cyclist pedestrian 6

7 In line Number of seriously injured

Number of seriously injured in Sweden 2006-2017 with required development until 2020 (incl./excl.

8 Number of seriously injured in Sweden with required development until 2020 (incl./excl. pedestrian falls) Seriously injured (excluding ped falls) Target 2020 Seriously injured (including ped falls) 8

9 Number of seriously injured by road user category in Sweden pedestrian car occupant cyclist mopedist motorcyclist other 9

10 Not in line State and municipal speed compliance 10

11 Share of traffic volume within speed limits on state road network and with required development until 2020 % Share within speed limit Target

12 Average travel speeds on state road network and with required development until 2020 Km/h Average travel speed Target

13 Number of speed violations manually reported by the Police and by automatic speed cameras Manual reporting Automatic speed camera 13

14 Share of traffic volume within speed limits on the municipal road network with required development until 2020 % Share within speed limit Target

15 Average travel speed on municipal road network with required development until 2020 Km/h Average travel speed Target

16 Not in line Sober drivers 16

17 Share of traffic volume with sober drivers with required development until 2020 % Share of sober drivers Target

Number and share of fatalities in alcohol and/or drugrelated accidents 2008 2017 n %

18 Number and share of fatalities in alcohol and/or drugrelated accidents n % Alcohol Illegal drugs Alcohol and illegal drugs Share of all road fatalities (right Y-axel) 18

19 Number of breathalyser tests (million) Number of reported drunk drivers Number of breathalyser tests and number of reported intoxicated drivers Breathalyser tests Reported drunk drivers 19

20 In line Seat belt use 20

21 Share of restrained drivers / front seat car passengers with required development until 2020 % Seat belt use in the front seats Target

22 Seat belt use in passenger cars and HGVs % Car driver Taxi driver HGV w/ trailer Car, adult front seat pass Car, adult rear seats Car, children rear seats HGV w/o trailer 22

23 Not in line Bicycle helmet use 23

24 Share of cyclists wearing bicycle helmets with required development until 2020 % Bicycle helmet use Target

25 Use of bicycle helmets for different age groups % Children, residential area Children, to/from school Adults, to/from work Adults, bicycle paths 25

26 In line Moped helmet use 26

27 Share of moped riders wearing helmets with required development until year 2020 % Helmet use among moped riders Target

28 In line Safe passenger cars 28

29 Share of traffic volume with highest crashworthiness rating in Euro NCAP with required development until 2020 % Highest crashworthiness rating Euro NCAP Target

30 Share of traffic volume with SBR, ESC and low-speed AEB with forecast until 2025 % SBR front seats SBR front seats forecast 2025 AEB low speed AEB low speed forecast 2025 ESC ESC forecast

31 Not measured yet Motorcycle regulatory compliance 31

32 Definition of the correct use of motorcycles Helmeted Sober (no alcohol or illegal drugs) Valid driving license for motorcycle Follow the speed limit Drive appropriately no wheelies or other reckless riding 32

33 Share of correct use of motorcycles in motorcycle fatal accidents % Correct use Unknown 33

34 Motorcycle fatal accidents % of cases: at least one of the following violations not wearing a helmet driving under influence of alcohol or drugs no valid license for motorcycle driving at least 30 km/h above speed limit 1% of cases: drunk, unlicensed driver driving at least 30 km/h above the speed limit without helmet 19% of cases: the only violation was driving at least 30 km/h above speed limit 34

35 Not in line Safe state roads 35

36 Share of traffic volume on state roads with speed limits above 80 km/h with median barriers with required development until 2020 Median barriers Target

37 In line Safe pedestrian and bicycle crossings 37

38 Share of pedestrian and bicycle crossings of good quality with required development until 2020 Safe crossings Target

39 Not in line Maintenance of bicycle paths 39

40 Share of municipalities with good maintenance of prioritized bicycle paths with required development until 2020 Municipalities with good maintenance of prioritized bicycle paths Target

41 Not measured yet Systematic road safety work 41

42 Systematic road safety work in line with ISO Management standard for road safety : ISO A voluntary tool for any organization that affects or is affected by road safety Road safety policy, interim goals and action plans 42

43 Present situation of road safety in Sweden 2017 Indicator Starting point target Number of fatalities Number of seriously injured Speed, state road network 43 % 45 % 80 % 2. Speed, municipal road network 64 % (2012) 67 % 80 % 3. Sober traffic 99,71% 99,74 % 99,90 % 4. Use of seat belts 96 % 98 % 99 % 5a. Use of cycle helmets 27 % 44 % 70 % 5b. Use of moped helmets 96 % 98 % 99 % 6. Safe passenger cars 20 % 72 % 80 % 7. Increase in regulatory compliance motorcycle - - no set target yet 8. Safe state roads 50 % 76 % 90 % 9. Safe pedestrian & bicycle crossings 19 % 27 % 35 % 10. Maintenance of cycle paths 18 % 36 % 70 % 11. Systematic road safety work ISO no set target yet 43

44 Summary Sweden 2017 The number of fatalities and severely injured decreased lowest number of fatalities since the 40's But, several warning signals speed compliance and sober drivers median barriers on state roads seriously injured cyclists Rapid action is needed if the 2020 target is to be achieved with systematic road safety work 44

45 TMALL 0141 Presentation v 1.0 Några exempel på projekt/åtgärder Eva Lundberg, Trafikverket

46 Några exempel på projekt/åtgärder - Sverige Geofencing Uppföljning hastighetsefterlevnad taxi Pilotförsök Aktivt farthinder statligt vägnät NYKTRA-Projektet 46

47 Geofencing Handskakning mellan fordonsindustrin, städer och myndighet att gemensamt kraftsamla kring hur digitaliseringens möjligheter kan bidra till säkrare och attraktivare stadsmiljöer Trafikverket regeringsuppdrag att testa geofencing i demonstrationsprojekt i urban miljö 47

48 Handlingsplan geofencing - fokus Säkra max hastighet Zonaccess Villkora fossilfritt drivmedel i zoner Nyttotrafik Frivilligt till villkorat system Statiska och dynamiska zoner Handlingsplan implementering år

49 Uppföljning hastighetsefterlevnad taxi Trafikrytm - Näringslivet förväntas bidra Yrkesförare har stora möjligheter att påverka såväl trafikrytm som hastighetsefterlevnad hos övriga trafikanter. Ett samarbete mellan Polisen, Trafikverket, Transportstyrelsen och VTI Studie: Taxiföretags hastighetsefterlevnad Hastighetsmätningar på motorväg med laser under april juni 2017 i Stockholm och Göteborg. Vilken egenkontroll finns? 49

50 E4 Arlanda Stockholm uppmätta hastigheter för taxibilar. 80 km/tim 100 km/tim 50

51 Sammanfattning Både taxiförare och vanliga personbilsförare är dåliga på att hålla hastighetsgränsen, men efterlevnaden hos taxi är sämre Det är små skillnader mellan olika taxibolag Taxi bidrar till att dra upp hastighetsnivåerna Företag som arbetar systematiskt och långsiktigt med hastighetsfrågan når bättre resultat Det behövs egenkontroll Taxiförare förväntas vara ett föredöme i trafiken 51

Pilotförsök Aktivt farthinder statligt vägnät Var finns de idag och vilka är effekterna? Kommunalt vägnät Hastigheten sjunker Bullernivån har sjunkit.

52 Pilotförsök Aktivt farthinder statligt vägnät Var finns de idag och vilka är effekterna? Kommunalt vägnät Hastigheten sjunker Bullernivån har sjunkit. Markvibrationerna ligger under gränsen för måttlig störning Topphastigheterna har sjunkit. Andelen bilister som väjer för gående har ökat. Pilotförsök på tre platser på statligt vägnät E65 Dragongatan, Ystad, första platsen 52

53 NYKTRA-projektet Gemensamt projekt mellan Trafikverket och Polisen Avsiktsförklaring tecknad mellan myndighetschefer april 2017 Ett nytt koncept för att kontrollera nykterhet och förebygga onykterhet i trafiken Konceptet ska möjliggör rättssäkra och automatiserade nykterhetskontroller i vägtrafikmiljön och vara utformat på ett sådant sätt att det krävs en begränsad närvaro av poliser och/eller representanter från andra kontrollmyndigheter Projektet påbörjas 2017 och avslutas

Relevanta dokument

HASTIGHETSEFTERLEVNAD HOS TAXI

Foto Mark Cruz, Unsplash HASTIGHETSEFTERLEVNAD HOS TAXI Anna Vadeby, Ary P Silvano, Åsa Forsman BAKGRUND: HASTIGHETSEFTERLEVNAD Hastighetsefterlevnaden är dålig - endast 45 % håller hastighetsgränsen på