03.01.11 CHRISTIAN RIBER: BIOMA SOFTWARE
Balansmetoden för bestämning av fossilandelen i avfall (BIOMA) Christian Riber, Göran Olofsson
Disposition Part I Ramboll The need Methodology Part II The solution Con Results Validation 3
Image size: 7,94 cm x 25,4 cm RAMBÖLL WtE Fler än 50 experter som enbart jobbar med avfallsförbränning Fler än 30 pågående WtE projekt över hela världen Många Svenska WtE kunder (Uddevalla, Fortum, SYSAV, ) Fler än 30 kontor i Sverige från Malmö till Kiruna 4
BIOGENT VADÅ? CO 2 emission Mass fraction Energy production MSW 5
VAD BEHÖVER VI? Metodologi Kontinuerlig visning Kostnadseffektiv lösning Vetenskaplig beprövad och accepterad Accepterad av myndigheter och beslutsfattare Accepterad av traders of green energy Outcome Lättillgängliga resultat Avfall Emissioner Energi Tillförlitliga resultat (osäkerheten låg) 6
Image size: 7,94 cm x 25,4 cm Fundamentala skillnader Plast (avfall med fossilt ursprung) har ett stort kol/syre förhållande Biogent avfall konsumerar mindre O 2 per energienhet Fossilt avfall har ett högre energi/massa förhållande Biogent avfall innehåller mer vatten och mindre inert per massa 7
BIOGENA FRAKTIONER In principle, a WtE-plant is designed to produce CO 2 from waste. Energy is released when C in waste is transformed into CO 2 0,60 C H O N S Content of C, H, O, N, S [kg/kg water- and ash-free] 0,50 0,40 0,30 0,20 Wood Paper, cardboard, hygeniec articles Garden waste Kitchen waste Textilies (natural fiber) 0,10 0,00 8
80% SAMMANSÄTTNING AV PLAST FRÅN BRÄNNBART AVFALL percent by weight [%] 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
O 2 CONSUMPTION
O 2 CONSUMPTION VS. CO 2 PRODUCTION Biomass (cellulose) O 2 -consumption = CO 2 -production Plastics (polyethylene) O 2 -consumption > CO 2 -production
ENKEL MATTE Brussels, Oct. 18 2007
BALANSMETODENS EKVATIONER Massbalans m B + m F + m I + m w = 1 Askbalans m I = a waste Kolbalans c B m B + c F m F = c waste Energibalans HV B m B + HV F m F - 2.45 m W = HV waste O 2 -balans O 2 C,B m B + O 2 C,F m F = O 2 C waste Skillnaden mellan O 2 -förbr. +CO 2 -prod. d O2 -CO 2 m B + d O2 -CO 2 m F = d O2 -CO 2,waste Derived from operational data Brussels, Oct. 18 2007
THE SOLUTION High quality on-line measurement of O2, CO2 Quality control of the above Registration of important parameters BIOMA software installed at the CMS system Monthly reports Yearly certificate 14
What BIOMA requires
BIOMA - Heizwert
BIOMA - Biomassebürtiger Heizwertanteil
What BIOMA offers Open and published methodology Price competitive Practical in use Reports Validation certificate 18
RENOVA Biogenic waste content 39 % 27 % 19
RENOVA Biogenic energy production Average 50 % Average 45 % 20
Validation in Switzerland 21
Results: two combustion lines Ratio of biogenic carbon [%] 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% Line 1 Line 2 Raito of energy from biogenic sources [%] 100 0% 01.07.07 01.08.07 01.09.07 60 01.10.07 80 40 20 Linie 1 Linie 2 0 12. Nov. 19. Nov. 26. Nov. 3. Dez. 10. Dez. 17. Dez.
Plausibility of operating data (prior and after) O 2 -consumption [mol O 2 /kg waste] 45 40 35 30 Theoretical limits Observed data O 2 -consumption [mol O 2 /kg waste] 45 40 35 30 Theoretical limits Observed data 25 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 Calorific value [kj/kg waste] 25 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 Calorific value [kj/kg waste]
Plausibility check of operating data 14.000 14.000 12.000 12.000 calorific value [kj/kg WS] 10.000 8.000 6.000 4.000 limits WTE (weekly data) Calorific value [kj/kg WS] 10.000 8.000 6.000 4.000 limits WTE (weekly data) 2.000 2.000 0 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 O 2 consumption [mol/kg WS] 0 220 240 260 280 300 320 C content [g/kg WS] Brussels, Oct. 18 2007
References for BIOMA Installed at 5 plants in Europe Tested on data numerous plant data sets Tested in comparative studies Scientifically accepted 25
Accepted by Authorities Austrian Authority for electricity labeling: (Energie-Control Austria) Belgian Public Waste Agency of Flanders (OVAM) Swiss environmental protection agency (BAFU) Organizations etc. TÜV Austria EMPA Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research CEWEP European independent organisation of WtE plant owners 26
Price not the only reason Site specific Number of lines Energy system Calibration/conversion Data quality CMS system Example: one line CHP with semidry Software fee 120.000 Installation 60.000 License (first year) 30.000 Evaluation? Total (incl. first year license) 210.000 Yearly license fee 40.000 27
TACK för er uppmärksamhet! Göran och Christian goran.olofsson@ramboll.se - ctr@ramboll.dk Insert preesentation titel (View/Header and Footer) 2009/01/08 28