ReBo-modellen: work in progress

ReBo-modellen: work in progress

(a) General description (b) Technical description (c) Environmental performance (d) Architectural quality (e) Social quality (f) Cultural quality (g) Economic performance (h) Renovation process ReBo-modellen: PL 1

(a) General description (b) Technical description (c) Environmental performance (d) Architectural quality (e) Social quality (f) Cultural quality (g) Economic performance (h) Renovation process ReBo-modellen: (PL1) Social quality

PL1 (e) Social quality levels: city neighbourhood between houses inside Framtidens boende PL2 Equity Connection / accessibility Living quality Cohesion Pride / sense of place Democracy, comprehension & action Safety and security PL3 Affordability Freedom of choice Sustainable transport Road infrastructure Accessibility for disabled Access to local service and jobs Social mix Residential stability Social networks formal/informal Public image (media) Identity Indoor climate Different lifestyle options Recreation and regeneration Participation all ages Education and comunication PL4 Demographic data Socio-economic everyday life situation Tenure New electric equipment Housing career Rent level Fuel poverty Heating costs Well maintained heating system Individual meetering Well-maintained sanitary & kitchen facilities (not Public transport Pattern and quality Carpool Balance of types (modes) of movement Bike paths Pedestrian plan By car to the area Entrances For deliverance Garbage collection Safety brigade Parking space/ household Costumization indoors/outdoors Presence of service Distance to service Range of service (and who besides residents rely on local service?) Job opportunities potential or support system for entrepreneurs Diversity of agegroups Diversity of apartments (tenure, size, Diversity of activities Social norms Turn-over Meeting places (formal/informal) Structure supporting meeting places Network of associations Friendship Tone and frequency Stigma Image of area What do residents like/dislike about the area Noice/air (staircases, ventilation) Good air quality Resident attitude (what is comfort?) Gym facilities Sport facilities Hobby rooms (music, culture) Bike storage Safe jogging/walking paths Parks Green space system (grönytefaktor) Benches and outdoor furniture Football terrains Playgrounds Outdoor lighting (successful maintenance) Crimelevels Street network Secure pathways Vandalism Designed links to create participation (urgent action priorities) Participation in maintenance (inside/outside - waste separation rooms, recycle rooms) Visibility of natural eco-cycles Local civic engagement Information system (owner to tennant) Pedagogic places near the house Educative gardens Exhibitions, seminars Discussions, dialogue PL5 measuring methods kunskapsbärare workshops with landlords security inspection (trygghetsbesiktning) surveys NBI Market surveys Sociotop map Interviews Cultural analysis Walking tour HGF Walking tours Participation in meetings PL6 legislation and recommendations Non-exclusive rental policy Strategy to maintain/create attractive center Policies protecting open space PL7 scenarios process LCM Internal competence ReBo-modellen: (PL1) Social quality

PL1 (e) Social quality levels: city neighbourhood between houses inside Framtidens boende PL2 Equity Connection / accessibility Living quality Cohesion Pride / sense of place Democracy, comprehension & action Safety and security PL3 Affordability Freedom of choice Sustainable transport Road infrastructure Accessibility for disabled Access to local service and jobs Social mix Residential stability Social networks formal/informal Public image (media) Identity Indoor climate Different lifestyle options Recreation and regeneration Participation all ages Education and comunication PL4 Demographic data Socio-economic everyday life situation Tenure New electric equipment Housing career Rent level Fuel poverty Heating costs Well maintained heating system Individual meetering Well-maintained sanitary & kitchen facilities (not Public transport Pattern and quality Carpool Balance of types (modes) of movement Bike paths Pedestrian plan By car to the area Entrances For deliverance Garbage collection Safety brigade Parking space/ household Costumization indoors/outdoors Presence of service Distance to service Range of service (and who besides residents rely on local service?) Job opportunities potential or support system for entrepreneurs Diversity of agegroups Diversity of apartments (tenure, size, Diversity of activities Social norms Turn-over Meeting places (formal/informal) Structure supporting meeting places Network of associations Friendship Tone and frequency Stigma Image of area What do residents like/dislike about the area Noice/air (staircases, ventilation) Good air quality Resident attitude (what is comfort?) Gym facilities Sport facilities Hobby rooms (music, culture) Bike storage Safe jogging/walking paths Parks Green space system (grönytefaktor) Benches and outdoor furniture Football terrains Playgrounds Outdoor lighting (successful maintenance) Crimelevels Street network Secure pathways Vandalism Designed links to create participation (urgent action priorities) Participation in maintenance (inside/outside - waste separation rooms, recycle rooms) Visibility of natural eco-cycles Local civic engagement Information system (owner to tennant) Pedagogic places near the house Educative gardens Exhibitions, seminars Discussions, dialogue PL5 measuring methods kunskapsbärare workshops with landlords security inspection (trygghetsbesiktning) surveys NBI Market surveys Sociotop map Interviews Cultural analysis Walking tour HGF Walking tours Participation in meetings PL6 legislation and recommendations Non-exclusive rental policy Strategy to maintain/create attractive center Policies protecting open space PL7 scenarios process LCM Internal competence Social quality: (PL2) Pride and sense of place

Pride / sense of place Public image (media) Identity Tone and frequency Stigma Image of area What do residents like/dislike about the area Social quality: (PL2) Pride and sense of place

Skogskyrkogården Karta: www.openstreetmaps.org Case Hökarängen

Gubbängen Veckodagsområdet Hauptvägen T B Pepparvägen och Centrum T Russinvägen Stadsbudsvägen Lingvägen Hovmästarsvägen C Tobaksområdet Case Hökarängen ca 9 km från Stockholm city Stockholmshem äger 3200 av 4700 bostäder grannskapsenhet bebyggdes 1945-54 första gågatan, Hökarängsplan Karta: google maps Arkitekt: David Helldén m fl Veckodagsområdet byggdes 1946 som nödbostäder åt fattiga familjer Tunnelbanestationen ritades av Peter Celsing, var slutstation

Mål: Att förändra områdets helhetsbild och öka attraktiviteten

Pride / sense of place Public image (media) Identity Tone and frequency Stigma Image of area What do residents like/dislike about the area Social quality: (PL2) Pride and sense of place

Public image (media) Tone and frequency Stigma Ryktet har hängt i nödbostäder utan dusch Krökarängen bästa svängen, Hökarängen förr... högst sjuktal och lägst inkomst i stadsdelen Farsta

Från sliten till blomstrande, inslag om Hökarängen, TV4 120524: Public image (media) Tone and frequency Stigma Stefan Lindberg Bästa svängen varumärket Hökarängen föryngring och generationsväxling medvetna satsningar & nu... Hökarängen är en oslipad diamant med stor potential (Emma Henriksson, artikel i Fastighetstidningen 120410)

Identity Image of area What do residents like/dislike about the area En komplicerad trappa...

Identity Image of area What do residents like/dislike about the area med omsorg om detaljerna...upp till en tidig (tom?) gågata

Identity Image of area What do residents like/dislike about the area Laila jobbar på Kastanjegården, fik och förening En omtyckt plats...

Identity Image of area What do residents like/dislike about the area ur Hökarängsnytt

Pressmeddelande från Stockholmshem 121008: Nu startar projektet Ett resurseffektivt Hökarängen som ska göra 50-talsförorten till ett föredöme bland bostadsområden när det kommer till resursanvändning. Bakom projektet står Stockholmshem tillsammans med Sust och Energimyndigheten står för delfinansiering med 9,6 miljoner kronor. (...) - Det här projektet skall utgå ifrån vad boende och verksamma i Hökarängen vill och kan göra. Energi- och hållbarhetsfrågor handlar ofta om olika tekniska lösningar. Ska vi nå ända fram krävs dock allas gemensamma engagemang, säger Ingela Lindh, VD på Stockholmshem. Några av de frågor projektet kommer att arbeta med är lokal handel, bilpool, närodling, insamling och återanvändning av kläder och möbler, matavfall och studiecirklar. Parallellt genomför Stockholmshem omfattande tekniska åtgärder på fastighetsbeståndet. Målet är att minska energianvändningen med 15 procent och CO2 utsläppen med 40-50 procent (2 000-2 500 ton) till årsskiftet 2014-2015. Projekt: Ett resurseffektivt Hökarängen

Målet med Hållbara Hökarängen är att skapa ett socialt, ekologiskt och ekonomiskt hållbart Hökarängen. Projekt: Hållbara Hökarängen

Boendedialogen 2010

Living quality Safety and security Indoor climate Different lifestyle options Recreation and regeneration Noice/air (staircases, ventilation) Good air quality Resident attitude (what is comfort?) Gym facilities Sport facilities Hobby rooms (music, culture) Bike storage Safe jogging/walking paths Parks Green space system (grönytefaktor) Benches and outdoor furniture Football terrains Outdoor lighting (successful maintenance) Crimelevels Street network Secure pathways Playgrounds Vandalism