Sammanställning för Lineär algegra 2 MATB22 vt 2018

Relevanta dokument
FK Electrodynamics I

Matthew Thurley Industriell bildanalys (E0005E) Response rate = 65 %

Sammanställning för Algebrans grunder, vt 2019

Anders Persson Philosophy of Science (FOR001F) Response rate = 0 % Survey Results. Relative Frequencies of answers Std. Dev.

MO8004 VT What advice would you like to give to future course participants?

Anders Odenstedt Vetenskapsteori för doktorander (FOR022F) Response rate = 61.5 % Survey Results. Relative Frequencies of answers Std. Dev.


FK Nuclear and Particle Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology

Sammanställning för Lineär algebra 2, vt 2019

IAK116 Perception/Färg, Ljus, Rum 1, 6 hp (VT16)

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

DVA336 (Parallella system, H15, Västerås, 24053)

IAK115 Kritiskt tänkande och teori inom arkitektur och design 1&2, 4 hp (H15)

Kontextuell utforskning, 8 hp, H15 (IDK213 KONT)

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

Adding active and blended learning to an introductory mechanics course

FYTA11-ma1, ht13. Respondents: 11 Answer Count: 9 Answer Frequency: 81,82 %

Methods to increase work-related activities within the curricula. S Nyberg and Pr U Edlund KTH SoTL 2017

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

Kursutvärderare: IT-kansliet/Christina Waller. General opinions: 1. What is your general feeling about the course? Antal svar: 17 Medelvärde: 2.

HT16-1DV433-7,5hp. What is your general opinion of the course? Respondents: 52 Answer Count: 22 Answer Frequency: 42,31 %

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

Kursplan. EN1088 Engelsk språkdidaktik. 7,5 högskolepoäng, Grundnivå 1. English Language Learning and Teaching

MO8007 VT2017. Antal svar: 4

FYTA11-ma2, ht14. Respondents: 12 Answer Count: 8 Answer Frequency: 66,67 %

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

Campuskurs Distanskurs Annan. Examinator Remigijus Gustas

Course evaluation SMD098, Lp2 2001

FYTN02, ht16. Respondents: 27 Answer Count: 12 Answer Frequency: 44,44 %

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

University of Nottingham ett internationellt campus med många inriktningar

D3.4 Documentation of Training no 1 including input for D3.5 Evaluation Report. Sweden

Poäng. Start v. Informationsteori, nätverk och marknader 7.5. Antal registrerade (män/kvinnor) 24 (21/3)

Kursplan. FÖ3032 Redovisning och styrning av internationellt verksamma företag. 15 högskolepoäng, Avancerad nivå 1

Contact by

Veterinary Anatomy, (basic course) and Introduction to the Veterinary Programme VM0054,

Arbetsmiljö för doktorander

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

TFYA41-Thin Film Physics /Tunnfilmsfysik/

PEC: European Science Teacher: Scientific Knowledge, Linguistic Skills and Digital Media

MÅLSTYRNING OCH LÄRANDE: En problematisering av målstyrda graderade betyg

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

Avdelningen för Produktionsekonomi Mars 2017 Veronica Lindström

Arbetsmiljö för doktorander

2009 GRADUATING NURSES (RN) SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT

Kursplan. NA3009 Ekonomi och ledarskap. 7,5 högskolepoäng, Avancerad nivå 1. Economics of Leadership

Immigration Studying. Studying - University. Stating that you want to enroll. Stating that you want to apply for a course.

FÖRBERED UNDERLAG FÖR BEDÖMNING SÅ HÄR

Pre-Test 1: M0030M - Linear Algebra.

ID Antal respondenter: 65 Antal svar: 11 Svarsfrekvens: 16,92 %

Kursplan. JP1040 Japanska III: Språkfärdighet. 15 högskolepoäng, Grundnivå 1. Japanese III: Language Proficiency

District Application for Partnership

Teacher portfolio

Supplemental Instruction (SI) - An effective tool to increase student success in your course

Kursplan. FÖ1038 Ledarskap och organisationsbeteende. 7,5 högskolepoäng, Grundnivå 1. Leadership and Organisational Behaviour

Individuell studieplan vid Högskolan i Halmstad Individual study plan at Halmstad University

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

Kursplan. FR1026 Franska: Muntlig språkfärdighet. 7,5 högskolepoäng, Grundnivå 1. French Oral Proficiency

Adjunkt / Lecturer Lektor / Senior Lecturer Docent eller professor / Associate Professor (Sw. docent) or Professor

Kursanalys 7,5. 3 / 5 / 5 / 5 /3 / 5 / 5 resp. 7,25 2,45. Fakulteten för hälsa, natur- och teknikvetenskap. Datum

Kursplan. AB1030 Att arbeta i projekt. 7,5 högskolepoäng, Grundnivå 1. Working in projects

DVA313 (Programvaruteknik 2: Projekt grupparbete, H15, Västerås, 24023)

Kursplan. FR1050 Franska: Skriftlig språkfärdighet I. 7,5 högskolepoäng, Grundnivå 1. French Written Proficiency I

Användning av Erasmus+ deltagarrapporter för uppföljning

Företagsekonomi, allmän kurs. Business Administration, General Course. Business Administration until further notice

Date: Beginning of September - Beginning of January

DOKTORANDUPPFÖLJNINGEN ÅR RESULTATRAPPORT

Kursplan. PR1017 Portugisiska: Muntlig språkfärdighet II. 7,5 högskolepoäng, Grundnivå 1. Portuguese: Oral Proficiency II

Immigration Studera. Studera - Universitet. Ange att du vill anmäla dig. Ange att du vill anmäla dig till en kurs. Kurs.

Immigration Studera. Studera - Universitet. Ange att du vill anmäla dig. Ange att du vill anmäla dig till en kurs. Kurs. Typ av kurs.


Förslag gällande beredningsgång för individuella läskurser på forskarutbildningsnivå

The Academic Career Path - choices and chances ULRIKKE VOSS

PhD What s next?! Pernilla Carlsson Careers Centre at Faculty of Medicine

Hållbar utveckling i kurser lå 16-17

The Finite Element Method, FHL064

MO8004_VT18. Antal svar: 4

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

Kursplan. NA1032 Makroekonomi, introduktion. 7,5 högskolepoäng, Grundnivå 1. Introductory Macroeconomics

Processimulering --- I teori och i praktik

Utbytesprogrammet Linneaus-Palme University of Fort Hare (Faculty of Education) och Umeå Universitet (Pedagogiska institutionen)

Course evaluation report CEQ, ETS170

FEKH91, Business Administration: Entrepreneurship, 7,5 högskolepoäng Business Administration: Entrepreneurship, 7.5 credits Grundnivå / First Cycle

Name: Beginners Swedish for Exchange Students, 1-20 points

Flervariabel Analys för Civilingenjörsutbildning i datateknik

Arbetsrapport CEQ, KIM015

HF Antal respondenter: 111 Antal svar: 31 Svarsfrekvens: 27,93 %

Campus Distance Other. Examiner Remigijus Gustas. Summary made by Its learning

Evaluation Ny Nordisk Mat II Appendix 1. Questionnaire evaluation Ny Nordisk Mat II

Kursplan. RK3041 Religionsvetenskap III för lärarstuderande: inriktning etik, inklusive examensarbete. 30 högskolepoäng, Avancerad nivå 1

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

Department of Information Technology, template version: 0.1 Page 1(2) Number of students passed

Course syllabus 1(7) School of Management and Economics. FEN305 Reg.No. EHVc 2005:6 Date of decision Course Code. Företag och Marknad I

Från extern till intern på tre dagar Erfarenheter från externa lärares pedagogiska kompetensutveckling

1. How many hours per week have you on average spent on the course, including scheduled time?

Information technology Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) v1.0 (ISO/IEC 26300:2006, IDT) SWEDISH STANDARDS INSTITUTE

MG Antal respondenter: 57 Antal svar: 14 Svarsfrekvens: 24,56 %

Transkript:

Sammanställning för Lineär algegra 2 MATB22 vt 2018 Kursansvarig: Gudrun Gudmundsdottir Övriga lärare: Douglas Svensson Seth, Alexandros Sopasakis, Björn Linse Antal studenter: 76 registrerade studenter Betyg: 19 st UK eller har ej tenterat, 50 st G, 7 st VG. Utvärdering I. Sammanfattning av kursvärderingen Totalt antal svar: 9 Kort sammanfattning av resultatet: Sammantaget var studenterna nöjda med kursen. II. III. IV. Lärarlagets kommentarer Lärarlaget tyckte att kursen gick bra. Utvärdering av förändringar sedan förra kursen Sedan förra gången kursen inte ändrats. Förslag till förändringar till nästa kurs Till nästa gång kursen ges planeras inga ändringar. 2018-06-18, sammanställning är gjord av Gudrun Gudmundsdottir Sammanställningen mailas till studierektor: Anna-Maria.Persson@math.lu.se

MATB22 Linear Algebra Spring 2018 Answer Count: 9 The course in general The content of the course matched my expectations. The content of the course matched my expectations. I disagree 0 (0.0%) I partially disagree 0 (0.0%) I partially agree 3 (33.3%) I fully agree 6 (66.7%) The content of the course matched my expectations. 3.7 0.5

The information about the course (schedule, exam etc.) via Internet has been satisfactory. The information about the course (schedule, exam etc.) via Internet has been satisfactory. I disagree 0 (0.0%) I partially disagree 0 (0.0%) I partially agree 3 (33.3%) I fully agree 6 (66.7%) The information about the course (schedule, exam etc.) via Internet has been satisfactory. 3.7 0.5 The information about the course (schedules, exam etc.) via lectures/and seminars has been satisfactory. The information about the course (schedules, exam etc.) via lectures/and seminars has been satisfactory. I disagree 0 (0.0%) I partially disagree 0 (0.0%) I partially agree 2 (22.2%) I fully agree 7 (77.8%) The information about the course (schedules, exam etc.) via lectures/and seminars has been satisfactory. 3.8 0.4

The course was organized in a satisfactory manner. The course was organized in a satisfactory manner. I disagree 1 (11.1%) I partially disagree 0 (0.0%) I partially agree 1 (11.1%) I fully agree 7 (77.8%) The course was organized in a satisfactory manner. 3.6 1.0 The course material has been comprehensible. The course material has been comprehensible. I disagree 1 (11.1%) I partially disagree 0 (0.0%) I partially agree 2 (22.2%) I fully agree 6 (66.7%) The course material has been comprehensible. 3.4 1.0

My prior knowledge has been sufficient in order to be able to assimilate the contents of the course. My prior knowledge has been sufficient in order to be able to assimilate the contents of the course. I disagree 0 (0.0%) I partially disagree 0 (0.0%) I partially agree 3 (33.3%) I fully agree 6 (66.7%) My prior knowledge has been sufficient in order to be able to assimilate the contents of the course. 3.7 0.5 How many hours per week have you spent on studying for this course, including scheduled hours? How many hours per week have you spent on studying for this course, including scheduled hours? - From How many hours per week have you spent on studying for this course, including scheduled hours? - From 2-3 1 (11.1%) 4-5 0 (0.0%) 6-7 0 (0.0%) 8-9 3 (33.3%) 10-11 2 (22.2%) 12-13 0 (0.0%) 14-15 1 (11.1%) 16-17 1 (11.1%) 18-19 0 (0.0%) 20-21 1 (11.1%) How many hours per week have you spent on studying for this course, including scheduled hours? - From 10.9 5.2

How many hours per week have you spent on studying for this course, including scheduled hours? - To How many hours per week have you spent on studying for this course, including scheduled hours? - To 3-5 1 (11.1%) 6-8 0 (0.0%) 9-11 0 (0.0%) 12-14 0 (0.0%) 15-17 2 (22.2%) 18-20 3 (33.3%) 21-23 0 (0.0%) 24-26 2 (22.2%) 27-29 0 (0.0%) 30-32 1 (11.1%) How many hours per week have you spent on studying for this course, including scheduled hours? - To 19.3 7.4

Course literature, course material The course literature has been informative and relevant. The course literature has been informative and relevant. I totally disagree. 1 (11.1%) I partially agree. 2 (22.2%) I completely agree. 6 (66.7%) The course literature has been informative and relevant. 3.4 1.0 I have used the course literature and material extensively. I have used the course literature and material extensively. I totally disagree. 1 (11.1%) I partially disagree. 1 (11.1%) I partially agree. 0 (0.0%) I completely agree. 7 (77.8%) I have used the course literature and material extensively. 3.4 1.1

The complementary course material has been satisfactory. The complementary course material has been satisfactory. I totally disagree. 1 (11.1%) I partially disagree. 1 (11.1%) I partially agree. 1 (11.1%) I completely agree. 6 (66.7%) The complementary course material has been satisfactory. 3.3 1.1 The course website The course website was easy to reach and navigate. The course website was easy to reach and navigate. I partially agree. 2 (22.2%) I totally agree. 7 (77.8%) The course website was easy to reach and navigate. 3.8 0.4

I have used the course website extensively during the course. I have used the course website extensively during the course. I partially disagree. 4 (44.4%) I partially agree. 4 (44.4%) I totally agree. 1 (11.1%) I have used the course website extensively during the course. 2.7 0.7 The information posted on the course website has been satisfactory. The information posted on the course website has been satisfactory. I partially disagree. 1 (11.1%) I partially agree. 3 (33.3%) I totally agree. 5 (55.6%) The information posted on the course website has been satisfactory. 3.4 0.7

The material posted on the course website has been relevant. The material posted on the course website has been relevant. I partially agree. 4 (44.4%) I totally agree. 5 (55.6%) The material posted on the course website has been relevant. 3.6 0.5 Lectures The planning of the lectures has been satisfactory. The planning of the lectures has been satisfactory. I partially agree. 1 (11.1%) I totally agree. 8 (88.9%) The planning of the lectures has been satisfactory. 3.9 0.3

The number of lectures has been satisfactory. The number of lectures has been satisfactory. I partially agree. 2 (22.2%) I totally agree. 7 (77.8%) The number of lectures has been satisfactory. 3.8 0.4 The pace of the lectures matched the content of the course. The pace of the lectures matched the content of the course. I partially agree. 1 (11.1%) I totally agree. 8 (88.9%) The pace of the lectures matched the content of the course. 3.9 0.3

The lecturer presented the material in a pedagogical manner. The lecturer presented the material in a pedagogical manner. I totally disagree. 1 (11.1%) I partially agree. 1 (11.1%) I totally agree. 7 (77.8%) The lecturer presented the material in a pedagogical manner. 3.6 1.0 To which extent did you attend the lectures? (percentage) To which extent did you attend the lectures? (percentage) 46-51 1 (14.3%) 52-57 0 (0.0%) 58-63 0 (0.0%) 64-69 0 (0.0%) 70-75 0 (0.0%) 76-81 2 (28.6%) 82-87 0 (0.0%) 88-93 2 (28.6%) 94-99 1 (14.3%) 100-105 1 (14.3%) Total 7 (100.0%) To which extent did you attend the lectures? (percentage) 84.1 17.0

Seminars The number of seminars has been satisfactory. The number of seminars has been satisfactory. I partially agree. 2 (25.0%) I totally agree. 6 (75.0%) Total 8 (100.0%) The number of seminars has been satisfactory. 3.8 0.5 The teaching form and planning of the seminars has been satisfactory. The teaching form and planning of the seminars has been satisfactory. I partially agree. 2 (25.0%) I totally agree. 6 (75.0%) Total 8 (100.0%) The teaching form and planning of the seminars has been satisfactory. 3.8 0.5

The seminars contributed to increase my understanding of the subject. The seminars contributed to increase my understanding of the subject. I partially agree. 4 (50.0%) I totally agree. 4 (50.0%) Total 8 (100.0%) The seminars contributed to increase my understanding of the subject. 3.5 0.5 I have actively participated in the seminars. I have actively participated in the seminars. I totally disagree. 1 (11.1%) I partially disagree. 4 (44.4%) I partially agree. 2 (22.2%) I totally agree. 2 (22.2%) I have actively participated in the seminars. 2.6 1.0

To which extent did you attend the seminars? (percentage) To which extent did you attend the seminars? (percentage) 0-10 1 (11.1%) 11-21 1 (11.1%) 22-32 1 (11.1%) 33-43 0 (0.0%) 44-54 0 (0.0%) 55-65 1 (11.1%) 66-76 1 (11.1%) 77-87 0 (0.0%) 88-98 2 (22.2%) 99-109 2 (22.2%) To which extent did you attend the seminars? (percentage) 62.1 38.3 How many hours did you spend to prepare for the seminars? How many hours did you spend to prepare for the seminars? 0-1 3 (37.5%) 2-3 3 (37.5%) 4-5 1 (12.5%) 6-7 0 (0.0%) 8-9 0 (0.0%) 10-11 1 (12.5%) 12-13 0 (0.0%) 14-15 0 (0.0%) 16-17 0 (0.0%) 18-19 0 (0.0%) Total 8 (100.0%) How many hours did you spend to prepare for the seminars? 3.1 3.2

Examination The examination form has been satisfactory. The examination form has been satisfactory. I partially agree. 2 (25.0%) I totally agree. 6 (75.0%) Total 8 (100.0%) The examination form has been satisfactory. 3.8 0.5 The degree of difficulty of the examination matched the content of the course. The degree of difficulty of the examination matched the content of the course. I partially agree. 2 (25.0%) I totally agree. 6 (75.0%) Total 8 (100.0%) The degree of difficulty of the examination matched the content of the course. 3.8 0.5

The exam questions reflected the content of the course and matched the learning objectives. The exam questions reflected the content of the course and matched the learning objectives. I partially agree. 2 (25.0%) I totally agree. 6 (75.0%) Total 8 (100.0%) The exam questions reflected the content of the course and matched the learning objectives. 3.8 0.5 The grade that I received on the exam reflects my work during the course. The grade that I received on the exam reflects my work during the course. I partially agree. 2 (25.0%) I totally agree. 6 (75.0%) Total 8 (100.0%) The grade that I received on the exam reflects my work during the course. 3.8 0.5