Tankesmedja för friluftsliv 13 april Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 1
Värdera det ovärderliga Tankesmedja för friluftsliv 2016 Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 2
Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 3
Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 4
Vad ser du mest fram emot under denna Tankesmedja för friluftsliv? Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 5
#friluftsliv16 Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 6
Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 7
10.45 Föreläsningar Plenum 11.45 På gång 90 sekunder Plenum 12.15 Lunch Matsal + en tr ned 13.30 Parallella seminarier 1 Se lista 15.00 Fika I huvudbyggnad 15.30 Parallella seminarier 2 Se lista 17.00 Paus 18.00 Mingel och prisutdelning Plenum 19.00 Middag Matsal 13 april Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 8
8.30 Klas Sandell och Daniel Williams Plenum 10.00 Paus Fika utanför 10.30 Parallella sessioner Se lista 11.45 Lunch Matsal en tr ned 13.00 Hur gick det i Norge? Bilden av Sverige Beteendeekonomi 15.00 Avslutning och fika Bussen går 15.30 Plenum 14 april Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 9
Hur man får turister från 75 länder att komma till Skinnskatteberg för att titta på älgar Marcus Eldh från WildSweden, vinnare av Stora Turismpriset 2015 Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 10
The Value of Protected Areas for Society Liisa Kajala Forststyrelsen, Finland Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 11
The Value of Protected Areas for Society Tankesmedja för friluftslivet, Djurönäset, Stockholm April 13 th 14 th, 2016 Liisa Kajala Senior Advisor Parks & Wildlife Finland
Contents of the Presentation Multiple and many kinds of values of protected areas Quantifying the values The case of local economic impacts of Finnish protected area visitors The case of perceived health benefits of Finnish protected area visitors How to increase the value of protected areas for society? Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Metsähallitus Manages State-owned Areas A state enterprise governing all state-owned lands and waters Business activities and public administration duties (P&WF) in separate units Forest land in managed forests Poorly productive land Protected areas (P&WF) Public water areas (P&WF) Responsibility covers an area over 12 million hectares, 1/3 of Finland Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Parks & Wildlife Finland Manages State-owned Protected Areas 39 national parks 19 strict nature reserves 6 national hiking areas 12 wilderness areas almost 500 other PAs public water areas Altogether over 7 million hectares of PAs, 18% of Finland Approximately 6.2 million visits (2015) Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Finances of Parks & Wildlife Finland in 2015 Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Parks & Wildlife Finland manages and protects Finland s Visitor Centres most valuable & Customer natural treasures in a responsible Service Points manner For the benefit of nature and people 30 visitor centres and customer service points More than 1 million visits (2014) Visitor Centre Naava, 89 500 visits (2014) Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016 Photo: Metsähallitus/Tiina Hakkarainen
Photo: Erkki Ollila/Metsähalllitus Ecosystem Services Provisioning Services Supporting Services Cultural Services Regulating Services
? 19 Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016 Photo: Markus Sirkka/Metsähalllitus
The Total Economic and System Values Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
The Total Value of a Protected Area Total value Use values Non-use values Direct use values (recreation, scenery) Option value (future use) Existence value (original nature, species, habitats) Bequest value Indirect use (water, climate, photos, films) The visitors spending increases income and employment in the area. Spending effects reflect only part of the direct use values, not the total value of a PA. Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Contents of the Presentation Multiple and many kinds of values of protected areas Quantifying the values: The case of local economic impacts of Finnish protected area visitors The case of perceived health benefits of Finnish protected area visitors How to increase the value of protected areas for society? Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Method for Estimating Visitor Spending Effects (VSE) An application producing annually direct and total income effects ( ) employment effects (Jobs) Easy-to use, practical tool Estimate for each national park and other key stateowned protected area Cumulative, state-level effects Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Visitor spending effects (VSE) on Local Economies 2015 Total value Minimum value* Visits Million Jobs, FTE Million Jobs, FTE National parks 141.5 1 400 66.6 657 2 634 600 National hiking areas Cultural heritage sites (top 6) 12.2 131 7.1 76 275 400 6.8 65 1.1 11 23 100 *Minimum value indicates the spending by the visitors to whom the area (e.g. national park) was the only or the most important reason to make the trip to the destination Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Big Differences between the PAs Area Total Impact of Spending (Mill. ) Total Impact on Employment (FTE) Economic Impact When Area Priority Target (Mill. ) Impact on Employment When Area Priority Target (FTE) Number of Visits Archipelago NP 7.7 74 2.6 25 78 700 Bothnian Bay NP 0.2 2 0.1 1 8 200 Bothnian Sea NP 1.7 16 0.8 8 47 200 - - - - - - Nuuksio NP 2.7 15 1.7 9 343 800 Oulanka NP 19.0 190 6.8 68 201 200 Pallas-Yllästunturi NP 36.5 366 22.4 225 525 600 - - - - - - Torronsuo NP 0.4 4 0.0 0 25 700 Urho Kekkonen NP 21.5 214 10.2 102 291 700 Valkmusa NP 0.1 1 0.0 0 15 400 Total Number of Visits 2 634 600 Total Economic Impact 141.5 1 400 66.6 657 Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Basic Requirement: Standardized visitor monitoring data across the PA system
Visitor Monitoring Visitor Surveys Visitor Counting Visitor Information Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
ASTA Visitor Information Forms the Base of Regular Economic Impact Estimates Annual numbers of visits Visitor spending in the parks and their surroundings Other visitor information Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Why Estimate Visitor Spending Effects? The benefits of the parks are not obvious to everybody Decision-makers prefer numbers Money spent on the management and services of national parks and other PAs comes back many-fold through local private businesses and creates a plenty of jobs On average, 1 EUR public investment in the services of national parks results in 10 EUR return to local economies Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Contents of the Presentation Multiple and many kinds of values of protected areas Quantifying the values: The case of local economic impacts of Finnish protected area visitors The case of perceived health benefits of Finnish protected area visitors How to increase the value of protected areas for society? Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Increasing Evidence Shows that Contact with Nature Affects mental health Prevents chronic diseases Helps to recover from stress and illness Improves perceived quality of life Promotes positive attitudes towards life Enhances the sense of belongingness Photo: Timo Nieminen/Metsähalllitus Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Healthy Parks Healthy People Finland Public health improves as people get out into natural settings, enjoy positive and authentic experiences, and improve their health through a wide range of outdoor activities. Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
National Parks Move People An average hiking distance on a typical national park trip was about 15 km (2013) 34 million km a year in Finland s all national parks 850 times around the globe Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
National Parks Promote Public Health for Millions of Euros Health and well-being benefits perceived by visitors: On average 208 per visit, median 100 per visit Finland s all national parks year 2013, 226 million Photo: Kirsi Ukkonen/Metsähalllitus 34
www.julkaisut.metsa.fi Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Contents of the Presentation Multiple and many kinds of values of protected areas Quantifying the values: The case of local economic impacts of Finnish protected area visitors The case of perceived health benefits of Finnish protected area visitors How to increase the value of protected areas for society? Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Number of Visits to National Parks and Visitor Centers Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Branding Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016 Photo: Helifoto Oy/Metsähalllitus
Communication 39
Voluntary Work Photo: Metsähalllitus/Tapani Mikkola Photo: Metsähalllitus/Tuomas Uola
Attracting New User Groups
More information Visitor statistics: http://www.metsa.fi/web/en/visitationnumbers Visitor Monitoring in Nature Areas: http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:702543/fulltext01.pdf Local economic impacts of Protected Area visitation: http://www.metsa.fi/web/en/economicbenefitsofnationalparks Health and Well-being from Finnish National Parks: http://www.nationalparks.fi/en/hikinginfinland/healthandwellbeing http://julkaisut.metsa.fi/julkaisut/show/1746 Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016
Isojärvi Timo Nieminen Liisa Kajala Parks & Wildlife Finland, 2016 43 Metsähallitus Photo: Timo Nieminen/Metsähalllitus Liisa Kajala liisa.kajala@metsa.fi
På gång inom friluftslivet vad gör myndigheter och organisationer just nu? Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 44
Svenskt friluftsliv Per Klingbjer Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 45
Boverket Agata Bar-Nilsson Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 46
Folkhälsomyndigheten Kajsa Mickelsson Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 47
Tillväxtverket Helena Nyberg Brehnfors Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 48
Skogsstyrelsen Dan Rydberg Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 49
Havs- och vattenmyndigheten Fredrik Nordwall Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 50
Jordbruksverket Daniel Melin Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 51
Naturvårdsverket Maggie Javelius och Ingela Hiltula Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 52
Lunch Samling 13.30 i nya lokaler se lista Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 53
Parallella sessioner:13.30-15 1. Hur kan turism och besöksnäring vara en kraft för att utveckla lokal och regional attraktionskraft och därigenom stärka friluftslivet? Tillväxtverket 2. Kommunikation av friluftsliv hur blir friluftslivet attraktivt med hjälp av modern teknik? Naturvårdsverket, Outdoormap AB 3. Riksintresse för friluftsliv Riksintressets betydelse för friluftslivet ur ett lokalt, regional och nationellt perspektiv Naturvårdsverket 4. Aktivt skogsbruk och friluftsliv Naturvårdsverket, LRF, Centrum för naturvägledning, Skogsstyrelsen, Norra Skogsägarna 5. KOMPIS, tillsammans planerar vi havet! Havs- och vattenmyndigheten Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 54
Fika och utställning Parallella sessioner omgång 2 börjar 15.30 Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 55
Parallella sessioner:15.30-17 6. Hur kraftsamlar Skåne för att bli en av Europas bästa vandringsdestinationer? Region Skåne, Event in Skåne, Svenska Turistföreningen 7. Hur kan fritidsfisket bidra till attraktion och värdeskapande? Havs- och vattenmyndigheten/jordbruksverket 8. Ökad livskvalitet genom utevistelse i närnatur runt vård- och omsorgsboenden i Örnsköldsvik Naturvårdsverket/Örnsköldsviks kommun 9. Hur ska vi vända utvecklingen i Knäckebrödshult? Naturvårdsverket 10. Skyddade områden värden för friluftsliv och lokal ekonomi Naturvårdsverket/Centrum för naturvägledning till 17.15 11. Friluftsliv och grön infrastruktur hur värderar och planerar vi bäst för friluftsliv i landskapet? Naturvårdsverket Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 56
Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 57
Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 58
Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 59
Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 60
Regeringens friluftslivsarbete Gunvor G Ericson, Miljö- och energidepartementet Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 61
Sveriges friluftskommun 2016 Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 62
Hela årets friluftskommun
ÖRNSKÖLDSVIK med världsarvet Höga Kusten
Örnsköldsviks lokala friluftspolitik Friluftsliv för alla Hållbarhet och utveckling Dialog och samverkan
Samarbete över gränserna NATURGRUPPEN Naturvård Friluftsliv Kulturmiljö Parker och grönytor Utepedagogik i skolorna Folkhälsa Strategisk planering Skog och mark Naturturism
Natur- och friluftsråd
Natur- och friluftsting
Äldreboenden- friluftsdagar
Isbanan Bäckfjärden
Friluftsdag för alla
Höga Kusten Pondhockey Fotograf: Magnus Stenman
Herrgårdsparken
Kunskap och känsla i närnatur
Kommande utmaningar Inspirationsprojekt skogsbruk utifrån skogens sociala värden Natur- och kulturwebb Tätortsnära natur FÖP för centralorten Örnsköldsvik Skolans närnaturområden Äldresatsning Alla äldre skall ha rätt till utvistelse varje dag vid sina boenden
Middag klocka 19.00 i matsalen Naturvårdsverket Swedish Environmental Protection Agency 2016-04-20 81