Department of Information Technology, template version: 0.1 Page 1(2) 16 (1 remaining)

Transkript

1 Department of Information Technology, template version: 0.1 Page 1(2) Course Advanced Interaction Design Period (1-5; 5 =summer) Year Number of registered students Number of students passed Code 1MD001 Started with presentation of last year s eval + actions (Y/N) N (new course) Mid-course evaluation (Y/N) (1 remaining) Y Comments on number of students passed and evaluation answers All but one of the students that actually followed the course has passed. The one that did not pass did everything apart from showing up at the final exam due to family reasons Responsible teacher Jan Gulliksen Other teachers Elina Eriksson, Lars Oestreicher, Panayiotis Zaphiris, Bengt Göransson Teaching Lectures 15 Lessons Labs 0 Project Excursions 0 Individual tutoring Other - Examination Written exam Exam at home 0 Lab report 0 Assignments Report 0 Presentation 1 theory seminar Several individual assignments Yes, and via Exam containing 4 smaller tasks done under time pressure; Theory essay, Design portfolio, Interview to gather requirements and design Several individual assignment Students got a lot of practice in oral

2 Department of Information Technology, template version: 0.1 Page 2(2) presentations of their work Major changes done before the present course New course. Inspired by the previous summer course in interaction design. Identified or planned changes for the next course event Several. Given that it was a new course there is a lot of room for modifications. These have not yet been analyzed, but such a discussion is planned. Teachers comments (on e.g. student s prerequisites, own and student s effort, course planning, administration, examination, attendance, communication with students, tools used) Students were very skilled and active. They became good at delivering things with short notice, which was one of the course goals. Some exercises (e.g. first Joomla assignment) were not handed in at the appropriate time. Changes that I could see for the future: Make better use of the course book and perhaps find a different course book for the future. The unconventional exam form was very successful. Students performed impressingly well and were also happy with the results. More group work could be planned for. This year most things were done individually. Next year we could perhaps plan the course better, this year it was mainly done from one week to another. Need to plan it together with the preceding user interface design course given by Else With basically the same content, give a better feeling for the red thread through the course Possibly more of practical excercises spread over the course, and connected to the lecture content. Especially the first exercise lecture (with clay modeling) could be developed further, e.g., by connecting with the basic principles of simplicity. The portfolio design part of the exercises needs to be introduced more thoroughly, so that the purpose of the exercise is clear from the beginning.

3 evaluering Sammanställning SAMMANSTÄLLNING Utvärdering: Advanced Interaction Design 2008 Antal svarande: 15 WELCOME! In order to improve on the education we need feedback on courses. Please make sure you answer all of the questions. Text comments are appreciated but not required. Don't forget to click on "Submit Evaluation" when the form is complete. Your answers are anonymous. [Du får gärna svara på svenska ifall du vill.] What is your overall opinion about the course? QUESTIONS 1 ( = bad) ( = good) 20 3 Medelvärde: 3.73 Standardavvikelse: 0.88 What in this course has been particularly good? We can do the design part by ourselves.we can express all the opinions. 1 Interesting topics! 2 Lot of assignment to do. Learn by practice. 3 The good part of this course was the examination day, which showed that the course is of high level and not easy to pass. 4 Mycket duktiga och engagerade lärare. Man får göra många roliga uppgifter både på egen hand och i grupp 5

4 The assignments, both take home ones and the ones during lectures. 7 The lectures. Both those of the people from the department as well as the guests. 8 Guest lecturers. First course I've experienced this in! 9 The Assingnments where good 10 Lots of practical assignments, learn from doing, guest lectures from london 11 Maaaaaaassor av verklighetsförankring. Kul att göra saker handgripligen. Fantastiskt trevliga gästföreläsare, framförallt Neil. 12 Creative thinking and discussions 13 Gästföreläsarna. Alltid kul med insikter från industrin. 14 Interesting assignments, interesting indroduction to the concepts of interaction design, which is totally new to me. 15 How could the course be improved? The exam part is a little complexity 1 Maybe more formal and some more complicated tasks. A higher pressure of handing in things in time for those lazy ones. 2 Be more advanced as the name of the course state. 3 The course could be improved if students had to write more papers and write more about different subjects. The examination for instance was a big surprise, because we did not learn how to apply the knowledge we learned. 4 En koppling mellan de olika föreläsningar, nu känns dom som egna kurser, dvs det saknas en röd tråd. Något längre tid på sig att göra uppgfiterna, blir svårt att planera sin tid när det är så knappt med tid. 5 More about designprinciples and actual methodes 7 More exercises that are harder. More information about how the course is planned. 8 More feedback on the assignments 9 The exam was pretty bad, you cant send out important information 12 hours before the exam. Joomla sucks, dont use it anymore. 10 Probably the project would be larger to make the learning more coherent 11 Tydligare kursmål i början av kursen. Högre tempo på föreläsningarna. Svara på mejl. Korrekt information på hemsidan. 12 None 13 Bättre feedback på de uppgifter vi lämnat in. Fieldstudy:n.. ingen feedback alls. Workshopen: två meningars feedback. Det är ändå en kurs med få elever, det borde finnas tid. 14 The content of the lecture could have been more systemetic or concrete. We need to trace how far we have gone. 15

5 The total amount of work on the course, in relation to the credits, was... 1 ( = low) ( = high) 27 4 Medelvärde: 3.67 Standardavvikelse: 0.98 Comments on the amount of work: We are expected to do a lot of work during the exam. 1 The total amount of work is fair relating to the credits. 3 The amount of the work was quite good.. we had a lot of different kinds of subjects. 4 Det är inte särskilt mycket föreläsningar men många uppgifter att göra så det klumpar lätt ihop sig och man får toppar av arbetestid ibland... Nästan en uppgift i veckan är mycket att göra men de iofs ganska små men ändå :) 5 Most of the things in the course has been done before 7 Too few exercises! The ones we got were fairly simple and it was easy to get a high grade. 8 Normal amount 10 Lots of work 11 Kändes märkligt att ha både löpande utvärdering och en hyfsat krävande examensdag med upprepning av tidigare uppgifter. I förhållande till andra lika stora kurser var arbetsbelastningen mycket högre. Detta även på grund av att stora delar av arbetet dök up först i slutet av kursen. 12 Every week we have a assignment to do, and each assignment is focusing on different aspects.it is really good. 13 The assignments are ok, and could be a litter harder. The process of the exam is a little too long. 15 Did you at the start of the course receive information about previous course evaluations and measures taken because of them? no yes 33 5 Did you get the opportunity during the course at a scheduled time to give anonymous written feedback on the ongoing course (in short: was there a mid-course evaluation)? no 7 1 yes 93 14

6 What is your overall opinion about the teacher(s) on the course? 1 ( = bad) ( = good) 33 5 Medelvärde: 4.27 Standardavvikelse: 0.59 Comments on the teachers: We meet several teachers,we can recieve different knowledages from them. 1 I like the teachers, the guest lecturers... 3 I think the teachers were quite good. Lars and Jan have the knowledge and have the experience to explain the sometimes complicated subjects. Elina, is a new fresh teacher, which is good in what she does! 4 Lärarna är mycket kompetenta och duktiga i sitt ämne samt väldigt engagerade i kursen, det har varit lätt att få tag i dom. Dessutom kom flera utifrån och undervisade, en från london och en från ett företag, det är riktigt motiverande att se hur det fungerar i praktiken. 5 Somewhat unstructured lectures 7 I found the lectures a bit unstructured sometimes, but I found them inspiring and interesting. 8 Good teachers but sometimes there was a lack of organization. For example the instructions for the examination day came the day before the actual examination. 9 They where okej 10 Stort engagemang, men mycket ojämn förväntan av vår arbetsinsats. Över lag svårt att få kontakt med lärare över mejl. Väldigt gott bemötande i klassrummet dock. 12 The teachers are really kind and they gave us much more information about how to interact with the users. 13 They are good, so are the guest lecturers. 15 What is your opinion on the course material (home page, links, book, handouts, etc)? 1 ( = bad) ( = good) 7 1 Medelvärde: 3.33 Standardavvikelse: 0.98 Comments on the course material: The content of slides are a little abstract. 1 I dont like much the handouts, they need more description than just pictures, a picture can

7 mean different thing specially for someone who couldnt attend the lecture. 3 Very clear, everything was in the schedule 4 Slides från föreläsningen kom upp snabbt på studentportalen. Kursboken kändes något onödig och mest som en inspirationsbok för fortsatt arbete i området. 5 The book and articles are fun, but not much more 7 Well, we didn't work with so much course material, right? Studentportalen is crappy, but what can one do? 8 Interesting reading. The book could have been used more. It seems interesting! 9 Bad, only slides. Valuable information in them 10 Ostrukturerat, ibland direkt felaktigt och en hemsida under all kritik. 12 The course material is quite fruitfull and it contains much usefull information. 13 Vi har aldrig använt kursboken, kunde ju varit trevligt. Studentportalen har funkat bra. 14 The slides are good, but the teachers could have talked something about the textbook or guide us how to get some interesting reading. 15

8 What do you think about the course framing (the way the course was planned and executed)? 1 ( = bad) ( = good) 27 4 Medelvärde: 3.47 Standardavvikelse: 1.19 Comments on course framing: I think it is good enough. 1 Sometimes when we had done a task, it would have been interesting to take it to a "next step". For example, the ticket machines would have been nice to redesign. 2 It okay. 3 Was good! 4 Lokaler fungerade bra och det var inget strul med kursen. Lite mer tid för uppgifter vore bra men det fungerade rätt så bra ändå. 5 Does not seem to be much planning behind the lectures 7 Towards the end I realised that I would have wanted the following in the beginning: * Clear information about all upcoming assignments and their grading * Information about what the exam is going to be like. This is a test and in order to train for it, I really need to know how I'm going to be evaluated. 8 bad, not very well-planned 10 Bättre struktur! Mer tydligt i början av kursen vad kursinnehållet kommer att vara och ungefär arbetsinsats per kursmoment. Mer uppgifter tidigare i kursen, under de första veckorna var man näst intill sysslolös. 12 The course make us have many exercise and we practice like a designer. 13 Kunde varit bättre planerad. Mailet om tentan bara en dag innan själva tentan t.ex. 14 As mentioned above, the content of the lecture could have been more systemetic or concrete. We need to trace how far we have gone. 15 What is your opinion on the course examination (written exam, home exam, assignments, seminars, reports, etc)? 1 ( = bad) ( = good) 33 5 Medelvärde: 3.87 Standardavvikelse: 1.13 Comments on examination:

9 We needn't to do 4 parts,i think. We can just take 1 or 2 parts as the assignments. 1 The exam was both fun and stress, i found the questions very open not very specific. 3 The examination was very good. I liked the method a lot, which forced the students to show their capabilities in a very short amount of time! Bravo! 4 Ett stort plus för det innovativa examinationsformen, kul att få aktivt göra olika uppgifter på olika tider under dagen. Däremot kom informationen om hur examinationsdagen skulle gå till väldigt sent och det var svårt att veta hur man skulle förbereda sig förrän info kommit. Bra att ha många mindre uppgifter att göra istället för nån jättestor eller så. 5 I don't know yet, the assignments where good but the exam was strange, with the materials given it was hard to really give solid explenations of why you've done as you've done 7 I found myself to be badly prepared for the examination. I believe that the exercises we got earlier in the course were far to easy. The most prominent example of said problem is the design task: I found none of the exercises particulary relevant and the time constraint was completely new to me. 8 As I said before. More feedback on the assignments. 9 somehow a bit tough and pressured with one day exam 11 Kontinuerlig utvärdering är toppen. Men det kanske bör avspeglas på den avslutande utvärderingen också. Ojämn arbetsbelastning på de olika uppgifterna. Vissa tog fem minuter att göra medans andra var flerdagarsprojekt. 12 The final examination contains many aspects in the training of one designer in interactive area. 13 Designuppgiften vi har vid 15 kunde kanske skett innan det individuella schemat så hade man undvikit all dötid. 14 Everything is ok except for being a little to long. 15 evaluering 2.1 Copyright Tobias Jakobsson. Licensierat till Institutionen för Informationsteknologi, Uppsala Universitet.