Nätverksträff 11 juni Välkomna!

Transkript

1 Göteborgs universitet Karolinska institutet Lunds universitet Stockholms universitet Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet Umeå universitet Uppsala universitet Nätverksträff 11 juni 2018 Välkomna!

2 Sedan senast och på gång Strategiska planen för , ska vara klar i slutet av september SUNET-projektet och senaste URFI-mötet, beslut väntas VR Registerdatarådet, SND representerade VR externa referensgruppen för samordningsuppdraget rörande öppen tillgång till forskningsdata, Max Petzold representant för SND Samarbete med DiVA igång Samarbete med RUT igång ECDS portal och data överflyttade till SND Figshare inget samarbete med SND

3 Sedan senast och på gång Domänspecialisterna ( dosparna )

4 Domänexpertis och domänspecialister så långt

5 Domänexpertis och domänspecialister så långt GU Iris Alfredsson SND, samhällsvetenskap Stefan Ekman SND, humaniora Elisabeth Strandhagen SND, folkhälsa KI Gustav Nilsonne Inst klinisk neurovetenskap LU Anna Axmon LUPOP (populationsstudier) Margareta Hellström ICOS (kolportalen) Darren Spruce MAX IV Fredrik Bolmsten MAX IV SU Pontus Hennerdal Kulturgeografiska institutionen SLU Ylva Toljander UmU Anders Brändström Christel Häggström Karina Nilsson Xavier de Luna Inst för idé- och samhällsstudier Enh för biobanksforskning Sociologiska inst Statistiska inst UU x känsliga data

6 Sedan senast och på gång DAU-funktionstest Kommande arrangemang inom nätverket: Nätverksträff 8/10 i Göteborg Arkivariegruppen 9/10 i Göteborg Nätverksträff 4/12 i Uppsala

7 Sedan senast och på gång Utbildning: BAS Online, utvärdering Forskningsdata: tillgänglighet, hantering och samverkan (med Högskolan i Borås) o Nästa kurs: kursstart slutet av okt/början av feb, ev. Stockholm

8 Sedan senast och på gång Kommunikation: Kommunikationsplan på Basecamp Nyhetsbrev på gång Grafisk profil för konsortiet på gång Uppdateringar på webben fortlöpande

9 SUHF Open Science Work Sabina Anderberg Image credit: Lpcnew CC 3.0

10 SUHF Open Science Work 1. Survey in March 2018 to the higher education member institutions about the work on research data infrastructures 2. Recommendation for national general template Data Management Plan (DMP) 3. Recommendation for national general template Research Data Policy 4. Possible assignment - national digital machine readable tool for DMP 5. Dialogue meeting with public funders 6. Strive for a national Open Science platform 7. Strive for an Open Access Roadmap Image credit: Lpcnew CC 3.0

11 SUHF Research Data Management survey The purpose of the survey - a quick and simple overall inventory of how far the Swedish universities have come in developing local infrastructures for research data management services and what kind of support can SUHF offer the universities Survey - 37 higher education member institutions. Anonymous answers from all member institutions The survey consisted of 4 overall issues relating to - research data policy, data management template, local RDM infrastructure, what are the most important questions in research data management at the moment - answer options yes, no and ongoing, as well as comment fields with the ability to write free text answers. 1. Does your University have a Research Data Policy? 2. Does your University have a Data Management Plan template? 4. Is there a local infrastructure for RDM at your University?

12 Recommendation general Data Management Plan Base content Sample questions 1.Description of data and collection or reuse of existing data a. Who will be responsible for managing the data? b. What type of material will be used? In which file formats? How much storage space will they require? c. How will the data be collected, created or reused? 2.Documentation of data and data quality a. How will the material be documented and described with accompanying metadata? b. Will the material be identifiable with a persistent identifier (PID) such as a DOI? c. What kinds of quality controls will be placed upon the data? 3.Storage and security a. Where and in what manner will the material be stored and made secure during the research process? b. How will sensitive information and personal details be protected? 4. Ethical and legal aspects a. How will ethical and legal aspects handled? Are there any possible limitations on how the material may be used, and if so, how will they be addressed? b. How will copyright, ownership and any legally binding agreements be handled? 5. Accessibility and archives a. How, when and where will the research data, or information about the data (metadata), be made accessible? Are there any potential embargoes, limitations or licenses to consider? b. Which material will be stored over the long term, and where will it be stored? c. Are any hardware or software required in order to make use of the material? d. What kind of costs or labor are required to manage and store the data in order to ensure that the material fulfills the FAIR principles