Europeisk forskning fri eller politiskt styrd? SUHF 21 februari 2017 Dan Andrée VINNOVAs Brysselkontor Bild 1
Forskning på Europanivå tillbakablick Europeiska forskningsområdet Horisont 2020 - Gemensamma utmaningar Mot FP9 och hur kan man påverka. Bild 2
The Framework Programme The Changing ERA Landscape 1983 2000 EU FP1 FP5 Project based: Transnational projects Mobility Access to infrastructures National/regional programmes National/regional programmes Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
2000 ERA European Research Area 5th freedom in the internal market (people, capital, goods, services) freedom of knowledge Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
Why was ERA established? European researchers are increasingly unable to compete with teams from other major countries such as the United States and Japan. Research is also good for the economy, and the products which are the end result of research and innovation bring benefits to everyone. Research funding (both public and private) is lower in Europe than in competing countries, and this gap is widening (3%-goal). European research activities are currently fragmented, with most research being carried out in the framework of national and regional programmes. Because there is no coherent Community research policy, national research policies often overlap, while other areas are not studied anywhere. Many problems (e.g. climate change) are pan-european in nature, and require a co-ordinated approach by all the Member States. Increasing levels of R&D in industry creates jobs and improves competitiveness. Research and technology account for a large proportion of economic growth, and have a positive influence on the quality of life of all Europeans. Bild 5
EU programmes interact with national/regional programmes ERA 2000 EU FP6-FP7 Better coordination of national programmes: Integrated Projects, Networks of Excellence, ERA-NET, ERA-NET Plus, article 185, Joint Technology Initiatives (art 187) National/regional programmes National/regional programmes Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
FP 3 FP 4 FP 5 FP 6 FP 7 FP3 FP7 Thematic structure unchanged RACE 2 ESPIRIT 3 - ESSI 1 TELEMATICS 1C (LIBRARIES; ENS; DRIVE2; AIM; TIDE; DELTA; LRE; ORA; TELMATPREP C BIOTECH 1 BIOMED 1 AIR BRITE/EURAM 2 - CRAFT - AERO 1C Information and Communications Technologies ACTS ESPRIT 4 - ESSI 2 TELEMATICS 2C Life Science and Technologies BIOTECH 2 BIOMED 2 FAIR Industrial Technologies BRITE-EURAM 3 IST Quality of Life 1. Focusing and integrating European Research IST FOOD LIFESCIHEALTH NMP Information and communication technologies Security Health COOPERATION Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology Nanosciences, nanotechnologies, materials & new production techniques MAT SMT GROWTH AEROSPACE Space NO Political priorities ENV 1C MAST 2 Transport TRANSPORT Environment ENV 2C MAST 3 EESD SUSTDEV NEST Transport (incl. aeronautics) Energy Environment (incl. climate change) IDEAS [European Research Council] JOULE 2 Energy JOULE THERMIE CAPACITIES Research potential of convergence regions STD 3 Cooperation with Third Countries and International Organisations INCO INCO 2 INCO CITIZENS International Cooperation Socio-economic sciences and humanities Targeted Socio-Economic Research TSER IHP (HUMAN POTENTIAL) SME SUPPORT Research for the benefit of SMEs HCM ETAN Stimulation of the Training & Mobility of Researchers TMR INNOVATION - SME 2. Structuring the ERA MOBILITY INNOVATION INFRASTRUCTURES PEOPLE [Marie Curie actions] Research Infrastructures Dissemination and Exploitation of Results INNOVATION SOCIETY 3. Strengthening the foundations of the ERA POLICIES Science in society Support to the coherent development of research policies Region s of knowledge RENA COORDINATION Coordination of Research activities Report of the Expert Group, FP6 evaluation, February 2009 FUSION 11C NFS 1 Research and Training in the Nuclear Sector FUSION 12C NFS 2 EURATOM - 1. Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion - 2. Nuclear Fission EURATOM Joint Technology Initiatives EURATOM Indirect actions (fusion energy research; nuclear fission and radiation protection) Direct action (JRC) Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
FP3 Horizon 2020 Budget increases Programme FP3 1425 FP4 3304 FP5 3740 FP6 4375 MEUR/year FP7 7767 (2014:10 000) Horizon 2020 FP9 10 000? Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
LUND Conference July 2009 Declaration the need to identify and respond to the grand challenges of our time global warming, energy supply, water and food, ageing society, public health, pandemics and security calls for a new deal among European institutions and Member States involving stakeholders http://www.vinnova.se/in-english/eupresidency/passedpresidency-events/new-world-new-solutions/ Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
EU and national programmes get more integrated Joint Programming societal challenges ERA 2009 EU National/regional programmes National/regional programmes Joint programming Driven by Member States Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
Horizon 2020 The basics - three priorities Excellent science Industrial leadership Societal challenges
Lund Revisited Next steps in tackling Societal Challenges Lund 2009 changed the Framework Programme Lund 2015 should change national programmes/strategies & importance of Impact Ministry of Education and Research Sweden
ERA Framework 20 June 2012 ERA Road-map 29 May 2015 Increased effectiveness of national systems Increased transnational co-operation and competition (incl. Research Infrastrucures) An open labour market for researchers Gender equality and gender mainstreaming in research Optimal circulation and transfer of scientific knowledge International cooperation (separate Communication)
P2Ps - on background of 2008 Chart 2012 + 2014* MAPPING ERA - 2 *Clarotti & Delescluse: European Commission 2014 Alignment @ IGLOO, 1-15 G. Clarotti - 14
Bild 15 FP9
2014 Juncker s priorities Bild 16 A new boost for jobs, growth and investment A connected digital single market A resilient Energy Union with a forward-looking climate change policy A deeper and fairer internal market with a strengthened industrial base A deeper and fairer Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) A reasonable and balanced free trade agreement with the United States An area of Justice and Fundamental Rights based on mutual trust Towards a new policy on migration Europe as a stronger global actor A Union of democratic change.
Issue papers https://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/index_en.cfm?pg=hlg
Bild 18 Horizon 2020
Discussed areas for H2020 2018-2020 WP Winning the race for a low-carbon, climate resilient Europe Digitisation Connecting economic and environmental gains the Circular Economy Supporting the Security Union Bild 19
The Framework Programme is not a research programme it is a political instrument where R&I and their impact are very important Horizon 2020 Bild 20
You need a strategy for participation and to give input! Bild 21
Strategy for increased participation and input to the European Commission (EC) Articulate what you would like to achieve in relation to e.g. national programmes/activities EU policy National Networks Public Sector European Networks LERU, EUA Strategy for participation e.g. follow, lead, new areas, standarisation etcetera Give useful input to the Commission at the right time
Sverige i Horisont 2020 Tyskland Storbritannien Frankrike Spanien Italien Nederländerna Belgien Sverige Österrike Danmark Grekland Finland Norge Israel Irland Portugal Schweiz Polen Tjeckien Ungern En dryg tredjedel av deltagarna främst företag har inte varit med i tidigare ramprogram Svenska organisationer beviljade 552 M i 857 projekt Svenska parter beviljas i snitt 500 000 per samverkansprojekt Sveriges andel 3,3 % ecorda 1 juni 2016 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Miljoner Euro (MEuro)
Starka och svaga områden 7,00% 6,00% 5,00% 4,00% 3,00% 2,00% 1,00% 0,00% ecorda 1 juni 2016
Svenska organisationers deltagande topp 20 Beviljade projektmedel ( ) Antal projektdeltaganden 1 LUNDS UNIVERSITET 53 263 173 77 2 KAROLINSKA INSTITUTET 43 695 185 78 3 KUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HÖGSKOLAN 42 065 029 86 4 CHALMERS TEKNISKA HÖGSKOLA AB 40 499 895 68 5 UPPSALA UNIVERSITET 34 195 950 62 6 STOCKHOLMS UNIVERSITET 16 644 441 32 7 LINKÖPINGS UNIVERSITET 15 419 561 34 8 GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET 13 517 266 38 9 EUROPEAN SPALLATION SOURCE ESS AB 12 159 173 5 10 SP SVERIGES TEKNISKA FORSKNINGSINSTITUT AB 10 911 871 30 11 LULEÅ TEKNISKA UNIVERSITET 10 252 861 22 12 SWEREA MEFOS AB 8 117 525 3 13 UMEÅ UNIVERSITET 6 694 645 12 14 VETENSKAPSRÅDET 6 255 098 7 15 STOCKHOLMS STAD 6 120 929 3 16 SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET 6 094 132 17 17 FORMAS 5 979 762 9 18 VOLVO PERSONVAGNAR AB 5 445 877 7 19 STATENS ENERGIMYNDIGHET 5 329 467 9 20 SEKAB E-TECHNOLOGY AB 5 114 571 2 ecorda 1 juni 2016
Fördelning svenska UoH
The three phases in EU-policy 1. Preparation 2. Decision 3. Implementation Framework Framework Biennial Work Programmes (WP) Commission Proposal Right of initiative + Consultation (Council, EP etc.) Council European Parliament Commission Lobbying Commission Programme Committees, Advisory Groups H2020 2009-2011 2012 2013 2014 2020 (2024) FP7 2003-2004 2005 2006 2007 2013 (2017) Horizon II 2016-2018 2019-2020
SE MS EU EC Topic: Enskild person, SME Område ( hälsa ): institut, fakultet, företag, mindre lärosäte Ramprogramnivå: större lärosäten, företag, offentlig sektor, stakeholders (IVA) Påverkansnivåer = Konsulter Project officers = = Plattformar: ETP, SETPLAN, PPPer etc Branchorganisationer Lobbyorganistationer Science Europe, EUA, Business Europe,LERU, EARTO, TAFTIE HoU, Directors Rådgivande grupper DG High Level Groups Regeringsnivå = EP, Council Commissioner
SE MS EU EC Topic: Enskild person, SME Område (Hälsa) : institut, fakultet, företag, mindre lärosäte Ramprogramnivå: större lärosäten, företag, offentlig sektor, stakeholders (IVA) Möjliga påverkansvägar = Konsulter Project officers = = Plattformar: ETP, SETPLAN, PPPer etc Branchorganisationer Lobbyorganistationer Science Europe, EUA, Business Europe,LERU, EARTO, TAFTIE HoU, Directors Rådgivande grupper DG High Level Groups Regeringsnivå = EC, EP, Council Commissioner Svårt om man inte har en strategi
SE MS EU EC Topic: Enskild person, SME Område: institut, fakultet, företag, mindre lärosäte Ramprogramnivå: större lärosäten, företag, offentlig sektor, stakeholders (IVA) Rekommendation = Konsulter Project officers = = Plattformar: ETP, SETPLAN, PPPer etc Branchorganisationer Lobbyorganistationer Science Europe, EUA, Business Europe,LERU, EARTO, TAFTIE HoU, Directors Rådgivande grupper DG High Level Groups Regeringsnivå = EC, EP, Council Commissioner
Svenskt FoI-kontor i Bryssel VINNOVA och VR nationella uppdrag/ncp Svenskt utnyttjande av ramprogrammet och ERA Nätverk i Bryssel Pro-aktivt arbete Hjälper svenska aktörer
Exempel från Brysselkontoret Uppsala universitets ledningsråd 2015- fokus på policy och strategiskt arbete KTH:s ledning 2016 tillsammans med Stockholms stad, SLL samt samarbetspartners från näringslivet Besök på KTH, SLU, Umeå, UU, SUHF - 2016 KI, UU, LiU- seminarium om etablering i Hanoi 2016 Ett 70-tal EU-handläggare i nov 2016 för ett tvådagars möte 12 rektorer kommer i juni 2017 UmU ledningsgrupp i oktober 2017
Important FP9 key-words: Juncker s 10 priorities Moedas Excellence, impact and openness Open Science - digitalisation Open Innovation, Open to the World - global research area European Innovation Council European Added value UN Sustainable goals Industrial competitiveness Mission oriented
Forecast FP9 Dan Andrée Open Excellence Science Open European Innovation Council Open to the world Challenges/missions (focus on EU-policy with impact + UN Sustainable Development) Research and Innovation part of the Competitive Programme Juncker priorities indicates a Competitive and Growth Programme (cohesion, education, SME) public sector/end users involvement very important to deliver impact Bild 35
Time table EU -level 2016 High Level Group (Lamy) Jan Gulliksen (KTH) Open consultation on the H2020 interim evaluation (ended 15 Jan 2017) 2017 EIC High Level Group Nicklas Bergman May 2016 EC SWD on Interim evaluation 30 June Conference in June 3 July 2017 Open FP9 consultation October October EC Communication January 2018 EUs budget: 2021 25 (27) Beginning middle 2018 - FP9 proposal Bild 36
Time table SE - Level Horisont 2020 interim: Formas, Forte, Vinnova, VR Hearing RK 18 januari - 30 stakeholders Gemensam beredning inom RK Regeringens input före sommaren Inspel till kommissionen från nu till tidiga hösten Bild 37
Fri eller styrd forskning? ERC och MSCA helt fri Övriga delar När man skriver ansökan måste man vara medveten om de politiska målen När projekten börjar är den fri.