Horisont 2020 Topics

Transkript

1 Horisont 2020 Topics Proaktivt arbete för att föra in svenska intressen i kommande arbetsprogram Sofie Vennersten, CLOSER

2 MÅL Mål med uppdraget (1) Öka andelen svenska aktörer i ansökningar till Horizon 2020 genom proaktivt arbete Utifrån svenska medfinansierande aktörers intressen ta fram ett antal förslag på topics som kan bli konkreta inspel till kommande utlysningstexter som kommer att avse

3 MÅL Mål med uppdraget (2) Underlagen kan användas av svenska teknikplattformsrepresentanter i kommande möten (ERTRAC, ALICE, ERRAC, WATERBORNE, EGVI) där utlysningstexter diskuteras för ett svenskt inspel till kommissionen om prioriteringar och konkreta topicförslag t ex via Programkommittén Sprida kunskap om arbetssättet till fler svenska aktörer

4 MÅL Arbetsprocess under mars - april Intervjuer med olika intressenter Samtal med några svenska deltagare i teknikplattformar Webinar 22 april för (främst) inbjudna ur teknikplattformarna där ytterligare inspel samlades in Presentationer om uppdraget för att sprida information om arbetssättet och tillgängligt material till andra

5 Framtaget arbetsmaterial Topicförslag från i Sverige verksamma intressenter, beredda att medfinansiera projekt Förslagen är sorterade i samma struktur som EC utnyttjade för utlysningarna EU:s Teknikplattformar med medlemmar från EC, industrin, offentliga myndigheter samt F&I-utförare spelar en stor roll i detta arbete. De insamlade förslagen har därför även sorterats under respektive Teknikplattform och arbetsgrupp (där det har varit möjligt) Översikt över kända datum för inspel i teknikplattformar Exempel på hur ett färdigt inspel kan vara formulerat och vilka rubriker som behöver finnas med

6 Tentative Topic proposals to H2020 Work Programme

7 De förslag som är fetstilade har ett uttalat medfinansieringsstöd medan övriga föreslagits utan ett bekräftat stöd. Fler förslag är på väg in. 1. Waterborn 1. Information sharing for intermodal transport (Swedish Maritime Adm, ) 2. Automation for safer and more efficient waterborne transport and maritime operations (Stena, Wallenius, Swedish Maritime Adm, ) 3. Dynamic design of ships to optimize energy efficiency and safety (Stena, ) 4. Realising the transport capacity potential on urban & inland waterways ( ) 2. Rail Addressed in Shift2Rail 3. Safety 1. Human Body Models for in complex future accident situations (SAFER..) 2. Cyber security in transport 3. Zero vision traffic concepts for two wheelers

8 4. Urban Mobility 1. Smart services for shared mobility of people and goods (Nobina, ) 2. The interface and interactions between urban freight with long distance freight (Closer partners) 3. Integrated planning of people & goods transport (Closer partner) 4. Electrified consolidated people and goods transport systems (Volvo, ) 5. Logistics 1. Effective digititalized global logistics systems ( ) 2. Operable, business models for freight system consolidation (TRV, ) 3. Balanced truck loading of volume & weight goods ( ) 4. Business models for end to end delivery ( ) 6. ITS 1. Vehicle data & communication platforms (Volvo,.) 2. Digitalization of transport e.g. data analytics for new services (Volvo, ) 3. Infrastructure/vehicle based detection supporting traffic management (TRV) 4. Traffic synchronisation (Saab, ) 7. Road 1. Driver operation of long trucks at roads & terminals (TRV, Volvo, Scania,.) 2. Roads, gates, terminals & ports for long truck operation (TRV, Volvo, ) 3. Road & lane access control (TRV, Volvo, Scania, ) 4. Road, tunnel, & node energy infrastructures for electrified transport (TRV,.) 5. Road characteristics & truck performance (TRV, Volvo, Scania, )

9 8. Socio-economics & Behavioral research 1. Societal benefits of ultra low emissions and CO2 (Göteborg) 2. Transport digitalization potential) ( ) 3. Regulatory needs supporting innovation ( ) 9. Automation of transport 1. Work site/logistics center/harbor/bus depot automation (TRV, Volvo, ) 2. Road trains with automatized & collaborative driving (TRV, Volvo, Scania,.) 3. Automatized urban goods distribution & waste collection (Volvo, Scania,.) 4. Improvement in Semi Automatic Driving HMI for increased use rate (VolvoCars, AB Volvo, SAFER) 10. EGVI 1. Multi-technology propulsion systems (Volvo, Scania, ) 2. Flexible HD ICE operation (Volvo, Scania,.) 3. Buses & trucks with long electric driving range (Volvo, Scania,.)

10 GV Electrified heavy duty vehicles integration with fast charging infrastructure Specific challenge: Electrification of different types of transportation and delivery typically in urban and suburban areas (including buses, vans, medium-duty goods vehicles, and specialist vehicles such as trucks for refuse collection) is a privileged path to reduce their energy consumption and emissions. At the same time, achieving the same range capabilities using large over-night charged batteries would undermine payload capacity and vehicle performance (e.g. acceleration and hill climbing ability). It is therefore necessary to integrate either a range extender or solution for the fast transfer of significant energy volumes, be it at terminals, loading/de-loading stops or en-route. However, large magnitude power transfer directly from the grid can be costly and introduce disturbances into the grid. Furthermore, large power flows in relation to the total energy capacity of the involved energy storage systems may be harmful to the energy storage systems. Therefore, the different options of rapid charging at stops and continuous charging while driving need to be assessed and compared with respect to cost and their impact on the power grid(. The overall challenge is to design integrated, energy efficient low emission vehicles taking into account the powertrain, energy storage and the charging infrastructure needed to cover the intended missions, without compromising vehicle performance or driver and occupants safety or increasing the final costs to the users/customers. Scope: Actions shall address the development of vehicle, drive train and energy storage (battery and super-capacitor) concepts, which can deliver required vehicle performance and are able to operate in a pure electric mode with high energy recovery capacity to ensure zero emissions and low noise pollution, either on the whole mission or in designated low-emission zones, while permitting in the second case highly efficient, low environmental impact internal combustion engine operation without range restrictions in other areas. Such technologies can be applied to one or both of the following vehicle types: Electrified medium duty trucks for urban and interurban applications (freight delivery, refuse collection, etc.) capable of time efficient operation. Electrified high capacity buses (at least 12 m) for urban use, capable of following time tables and when needed effectively charge and drive at bus stops with multiple bus lines. For both above applications, where appropriate, development and integration in the vehicles, of power transfer solutions for ultrafast (< 30 seconds), superfast (< 5 minutes) and/or fast (< minutes) as well as continuous wireless and contact-based electric energy transfer technologies, demonstrating how the system level efficiency and economic impacts can be achieved, including amortisation of infrastructure. To ensure the acceptability of such systems into the market, negative effects on battery life and the grid, and measures to mitigate them should also be developed and integrated in the global system, as well as standardisation and health and safety implications. Extension of these concepts to lighter vehicles should be taken into account wherever appropriate to enhance the exploitation opportunities. An interaction with interested European cities to provide input on needs and implementation plans will be performed targeting market readiness by The Commission considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the EU of between EUR 5 and 15 million each depending on the number of developed vehicles and charging technologies would allow this specific challenge to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts. Expected impact: For electrified medium duty trucks for urban use: Energy efficiency improvements up to 70% in comparison with equivalent category conventional vehicles are targeted, with full electric driving ranges of at least 50 km (including energy recuperation and superfast charging at delivery stops). Low noise operation (<72 db) allowing e.g. off peak delivery. Polluting emissions below Euro VI with a Conformity Factor of 1.5 (legislated) in real driving when in range extended mode. For electrified high capacity buses for urban use: Bus energy efficiency improvements similar to dual mode medium duty trucks, with a practical operational range compatible with normal bus schedules, depending on whether charging take place only at end terminals or at bus stops. Reduced operating costs per km by #% Polluting emissions below Euro VI with a Conformity Factor of 1.5 (legislated) in real driving when in range extended mode For fast charging infrastructure: Power transfer capability above 100kW Transfer efficiencies above 90% for contactless systems Total system costs competitive with conventional low emissions buses or trucks. (Don t understand. This bullet is under fast charging infrastructure. Zero emission zones will add costs to these vehicles and the infrastructure compared to conventional diesel fuelled buses and trucks. If these zones are legislated it is not a problem. Compare the ~ 10k extra EATS cost for Euro VI compared to Euro III.) Type of action: Research & Innovation Actions Draft 1.7, lgr et al 10

11 Teknikplattformar, arbetsgrupper & datum Plattformar ERTRAC WGs & TF 1. Global competitiveness? 2. Safety & Security 6 juni 3. Long Distance Freight 5 maj 4. Urban Mobility 28 april 5. Connectivity & Automation 24 april 6. Energy & Environment 25 april 7. Electrification Task Force 18 april Waterborn? ERRAC? ALICE 20 april Övrigt imobilityforum? EGVI 25 april Member State inputs juni

12 Resultat så här långt Konkreta inspel till ERTRAC Urban Mobility arbetsgrupp där prioritering av topics diskuterats första gången. Konkreta inspel från arbetsdokumentet till arbetsgrupperna Connectivity & Automation samt Energy and Environment (ERTRAC) har gjorts. Här har inte skett prioritering ännu. Nästa steg blir att reagera och eventuellt agera på de dokument som kommer ut

13 Tack för uppmärksamheten!