Annex 1-7 ECMADE. User Tests. Annex to Deliverable 4.2

Transkript

1 Annex 1-7 ECMADE User Tests Annex to Deliverable 4.2 1

2 Content ANNEX 1 TEST OF THE WEBSITE ECMADE ( AND EXHIBITION UNG.SE TARGET GROUP: GENERAL PUBLIC AND PRESS...3 ANNEX 2: ECMADE TESTS ON SCHOOL CHILDREN AND TEACHERS IN SWEDEN AND IN SPAIN...13 ANNEX 3: TEST RESULTS FROM TEST OF WAI ADOPTED ENTRY FROM TESTS ON ECMADE AND SWEDISH MODERNISM...38 ANNEX 4: TEST OF ECMADE AND THE EXHIBITIONS ON IMMIGRANTS STUDYING SWEDISH AT LERNIA, KISTA, STOCKHOLM...78 ANNEX 5: TESTS OF ECMADE ON SMALL AND MEDIUM SIZED ENTERPRICES (SME)...95 ANNEX 6 AND 7: TESTS OF ECMADE ON ELDERLY AND DISTANT/RURAL CITIZENS

3 Annex 1 Test the website ECMADE ( and exhibition Ung.se Target group: General public and Press Test the website ECMADE ( and exhibition for the Swedish Museum Architecture Target group: General public and Press 21/05/2004 Version 2.0 Ola Björemyr, More Business Media AB Both reports have been translated into English 3

4 0. Executive Summery The Swedish museum Architecture has developed a web portal ECMADE and where an exhibition developed together with Kalmar Museum and the Kulturen in Lund has been included. The exhibition mainly target ung people studying at the grammar school level and the gymnasium. The first version the web portal was launched in spring The Swedish museum Architecture has assigned More Business Media AB to make an evaluation the web portal and se what connections there are between this material regarding the users prile and points view and the usability and usefulness. The aim the study is to get further material for developing the web portal and the structure and content the design. The target group for this investigation was press and general public (the Friends the Museum organisation). The study was conducted with a questionnaire. The questionnaires were published during 27/04/ /05/2004. During this period the target groups were encouraged to respond to the questionnaire by getting a link which was sent out with e- mail. The target groups were press and general public (the Friends the Museum organisation). Totally 300 addresses were supplied by the Swedish museum Architecture who also contacted the who also contacted Friends the Museum and asked them to respond on the questionnaire. The reason for doing this was that it was difficult to get access to addresses security reasons. The questionnaire to contained 17 questions (incl. a request to leave to be able take part in a lottery on cinema tickets). This type study with a target group with knowledge and an interest for the subject generally has very high response rate. Normally this type study has 5-15% respons rate, whiles a targeted investigation has higher respons rate (up to 50%). What is the issue is if the respondents have interest/belonging and if he/she will influence with his contribution. A reminder was sent out to the addresses within a week. Further one aspect which influences the respondents rate is that it took some time to respond on the questionnaire as all respondents had to go into the portal first and then surf round on the web portal before they could reply on the questionnaire. Totally 63 general public/press responded. This means that the group had a response rate on 21% which can be considered as very good as it takes some work for all respondents to be able to answer the questionnaire. 4

5 1. How ten do you visit websites on the Internet? How ten do you visit websites on the Internet? 20,79 1,98 19,8 57,43 Every day Once/more/week Once/more/month First time Comment (kommentar): Every day (varje dag) 57,43%, Once/many times per week (en/flera ggr/vecka) 19,80%, Once/many times per month (en/flera ggr/month) 1,98%, First time (första gången) 20,79% Almost 80% are users the Internet. In spring % used the Internet every day or once per week in Sweden so the population is more familiar with Internet compared with the normal population. 2. Are you interested design? Are you interested design? 4,95 Yes Neither nor 95,05 Comments (Kommentar): 63 (svar) 95% were generally interested design. Yes 95,05%, Neither nor 4.95%. 5

6 3. Design can be a broad concept. Did you get a better concept design after visiting the website Design 36,36 63,64 Yes No Comments (Kommentar): 63 (svar) Over 63% did get a better concept design after visiting the website The website really contributes to more knowledge on design. 4. How do you find the exhibition User friendliness: 4.1 User friendliness Very good Good Neither Poor Very poor nor C omment (Kommentar): 63. Very good (mycket bra) and Good (bra) 70% Neither or (varken eller) 13%, Poor (dålig) and Very poor (mycket dålig) 17% The conclusion is that ECMADE consortium should develop and improve the website. 4.2 Information: 4.2 Information Very good Good Neither nor Poor Very poor 6

7 Comment (Kommentar): 63 respondents (svar) 85% are the opinion that the information is good or very good. Only 5% finds it poor and 5% very poor. This is a good score which shows the information has high quality. 4.3 Graphic 4.3 Graphic Very good Good Neither nor 4 4 Poor Very poor Comment (Kommentar): 63 respondents (svar) A large number visiotors 74% (73) considers the graphic very good or good. Only 8% (8) considers it poor or very poor. The conclusion is that the graphic is satisfactory. 7

8 4.4 Experience 4.4 Experience Very good Good 18 Neither nor 8 Poor 2 Very poor Comment (Kommentar): 63 respondents (svar) 72% (71) the visitors considers the experience good or very good. Only 2% (2) considers the experience poor. The conclusion is that the website creates a positive experience for the person interested in design. 5. How do you find the exhibition Dimension design? 5.1 User friendliness: 5.1 Userfriendliness Very good Good Neither nor Poor Very poor Comments (Kommentar): 63 Visitors are very satisfied 29% (28) or satisfied 38% (39) with the exhibition. 15% (15) finds it poor or very poor. 8

9 5.2 Information: 5.2 Information Very good Good Neither nor Poor Very poor Comment (Kommentar): 63 (svar) The visitors consider the information good or very good 81% (79). Only 4% (4) finds it poor or very poor. It is a good grade for the quality on the information. 5.3 Graphic 5.3 Graphic Very good Good Neither Poor Very poor nor Comments (kommentar): 63 A large number the visitors find the graphic good or very good 78% (76). Only 8% (8) fins it poor or very poor. The comment is that a large group finds the graphic exiting but difficult to navigate. 5.4 Experience 5.4 Experience Very good Good Neither nor 4 4 Poor Very poor Comment (Kommentar): 63 9

10 Most visitors find the experience good or very good 75% (73). Only 8% (8) considers the experience poor or very poor. 6. What do you experience most on the website and on the Summery The design and the graphic s are ok. The content can be improved. The exhibition design-ung.se is ok. Comment (Kommentar): 63 (svar) The overall impression is that most respondents are positive to the website. Many find it inspiring. A lot respondents have left comments. 7. Does your website inspire you to visit the museum? 7. Insipiration 42,27 Yes 57,73 No Comment (Kommentar): 63 (svar) 58% responded yes and 42% no. 8. What do you find most interesting on the website? (Multi-choice - flerval) 8. What is interesting Inspiration Info rmation P edagogic Material Archivei mages Othe r Comment (Kommentar): respondents 42 Most respondents have chosen inspiration and information. 10

11 9. Gender? 9. Gender Woman Men Comment (Kommentar): Age? Comment (Kommentar): 42 svar 49% (49) are between years old. 11. Where in Sweden do you live? Comment (Kommentar): 70% from Stockholm 15% from Malmö-Lund 12. What would you like to improve? Many suggestions are about navigation, structure and pedagogical structure. The main is that the users have difficulties to navigate on the website. Some finds the technology very heavy to download. 13. What is your address? Comment (Kommentar): The Friends the Museum staff gave their address. The addresses were used by us to hand out cinema tickets to the positive. The annex with addresses is not published by More from integrity-policy reasons. 14. Conclusions The ECMADE consortium has been successful in making a web site for the target group where design, pedagogical content is interesting. Also regarding user friendliness, information, graphic and entertainment the website is quite highly rated. There is a large interest for design and the website among respondents. A large number respondents have replied on the open questions which indicate a large interest for the investigation. 11

12 The number respondents is not large enough to draw general conclusions but the selection is large enough to be representative for press/general public. Respondents are used users Internet. 95% were interested in design. 58% thinks the website will inspire to visit physical visits to museums. The aim the web site is appreciated. But as many have given negative on the ECMADE portal it should be improved. 12

13 Annex 2: ECMADE Tests on School children and teachers in Sweden and in Spain ECMADE Tests on School children and teachers in Sweden and in Spain Report 1: Tests on children (12-18) at La Laguna, Teneriff, Spain by Linda Sellstedt Report 2: Test the website ECMADE ( and the exhibition on students and pedagogical personnel for the Swedish Museum Architecture by Ola Björemyr, More Business Media AB Both reports translated into English 13

14 ECMADE Tests on children (12-18) at La Laguna, Teneriff Linda Sellstedt 14

15 Three weeks at the Instituto Cabrera Pinto in La Laguna, Teneriff. 1 Background The project work contained a test the exhibition SMILE (Schools Museums Internet Learning Europe) which is an exhibition at the virtual museum for architecture and design, ECMADE. The virtual museum for architecture and design is an EU financed project which the Swedish Museum Architecture is developing together with Centro Internacional Para La Concervacion Del Patrimonio (CICOP), on the Teneriff in Spanien. Other partners are The Lighthouse, UK, Fratelli Alinari S.p.A., Italy, The Museum Finnish Architecture, Finland and Paregos Mediadesign AB, Sweden. The assignment I got was to test ECMADE portal and the exhibition SMILE on children in Sweden and Spain. The Swedish Museum Architecture helped me to find a school on the Teneriff and to prepare for the reception. My tas k was to: Translate a questionnaire to Spanish Test ECMADE and the exhibition SMILE on children years. To make my assignment suit the objective which my institution at Stockholm University has it was decided that I shou ld make a report on how Spanish children work on the Internet and how I as a teacher can use the ped agogical exhibitions in my teaching besides the work I did for the Swedish Museum Architecture. 2 Method The method I used in the project work was: To translate the questionnaire to Spanish To produce a written presentation the tests for schools and for children Prepare the teachers in school Present the tasks for the children at school Survey the tests and see to that 85% as a minimum replies on the questionnaires and that they were sent to the Arkitekturmuseet. Write a report on how to carry out this type tasks on Spanish children. In the report I analyse the computer maturity among Spanish children. The method I used when I was at the school was a qualitative method called Observation Participants i.e. I study h ow the children acts on certain theamatic issus. These were Computer Maturity i.e. the Spanish children s ability to start the computer, use ordinary programs like the Office and use the Internet Analyse how I as a teacher can use the pedagogical exhibition SMILE on ECMADE and the portal ECMADE The School where the work was carried out Instituto Cabrera Pinto in La Laguna on Teneriff is an integrated Grammar school and Gymnasium. This means that the children are between ages My instructor at the school was Ms. Teresa Juan who teaches biology. I had a chance to experience the Spanish hospitality and stay at her house. I was very well received at the Instituto Cabrera Pinto. The other teachers and the headmaster were very helpful and I got a lot time with the pupils so I could manage my tasks. 15

16 Work with ECMADE and SMILE: I arrived at La Laguna on Saturday the 29 November The first days at the school were Monday 1 Decem ber. My schedule was following: During week 1 I followed the instructor on her lessons to get to know the school and the environment During week 2 I started testing the pupils. I took 10 pupils at time to the computer room and they could put on the computer and log in to the Internet. After having a glance at the ECMADE portal they could go into the exhibition SMILE. Totally I had to test 60 pupils aging 13, 14 etc. with 10 from each age group up to 18 years age. The selection pupils was done by the teachers in respective class. As my task was a qualitative analysis it should not influence the conclusions that I could not test all students in each class. We expect that the tests were carried out on the most computer interested children. Week 3 I carried out testing. I also had time to meet the Spanish partner CICOP. 48 out 60 questionnaires were answered. The reason for the drop-out-rate was virus in the computers at the time the tests. 3 Result from Instituto Cabrera Pinto, La Laguna 3.1 Computer Maturity The students between were very mature. They had had two computer lessons per week where they learned General computer science Office (Excel, Word and Power Point) The Internet to search information on the Internet and to use I had expected that young students should need help to log in to ECMADE and SMILE but all pupils managed at once. The pupils English was very weak. Therefore they did not manage to study the exhibition SMILE which was only available in English. The students between were even more used to computers. They have computer lessons twice a week when they learned General Computer Science, Office (Excel, Word, and Power Point) but also more advanced searches information on the Internet. Their English skill was not so good either but they managed to log in and look at the SMILE exhibition. My conclusion is that the Spanish pupils are just as mature with Computers as similar age groups in Sweden but their training in English is generally not so good. 3.2 To use ECMADE in education The ECMADE portal is translated into Spanish. All pupils managed to log in and then answer the questionnaires. All pupils had difficulties to test SMILE as SMILE was not translated to Spanish. All pupils had limited knowledge English compared to similar age groups in Sweden. SMILE contains a large number tasks which the pupils can carry out. During the tests ECMADE/SMILE there was not time enough to do all the tasks but most students said that they were interested in carrying out the project work at a later time. The teachers were interested in using SMILE in the teaching. After being with the students when they worked on SMILE I felt that I can use SMILE in my future work as a teacher in Spanish. One the tasks which the pupils shall describe is the house where they live, where the parent s work, what they work with, what their grandparents do etc. and what they can look at on the road to school. When they carry out these tasks they get a chance to use different words, bow verbs etc. The tasks are pedagogical and well performed. 16

17 4. Conclusions 4.1 Work in Spain For me it was very interesting to come to a Spanish school and se how they work. The climate at the school is quite different from Sweden and the teachers work less as a team and more individually compared with how they work in Sweden. Their pedagogical methods are also different from the methods used in Sweden. 4.2 The results I have delivered 48 on the questionnaire on ECMADE to the consortium (2 were no data in). They will include the questionnaires in the electronic database and analyse the results. 17

18 Results from tests ECMADE in La Laguna - schoolchildren year old ECMADE Age the respond ents in La Laguna % What was your first impression when you opened the ECMADE web site % Very user friendly Practical Confusing Other, state what Do you understand how to find the different sections and what the diffrent sections are about? Nu mber % Yes No 3 7 I don t know Do you find it easy to move around the site from one section to another? % Yes No 1 2 I don t know

19 Do you understand what diffrent exhibitions there are on the ECMADE? % Yes No I don t know Do you prefer pictures or tex t on the navigation icons? Numbe r % Pictures Text 4 9 I don t know Is the information in the ECMADE stored in a logical and us er friendly manner? Nu mber % Yes No 4 9 I don t know Did you ever get lost in the ECMADE? % Yes 6 14 No 84 I don t know 1 2 If yes whereabout? 0 If yes whereabout? (text) Whereabout: Eyes wide open En la visita virtu al En city por el idioma En enlaces que dabau a página que no se encoutraban Pressional services Was there any specific part or function the ECMADE that you found particularly attractive? % Yes No 6 15 Idon t know

20 If yes please explain what below (text) Hacer fraces para loseroles museum La de cámara Digital La portade Eyes wide open 3 Los edificios Exposiones 2 Common place The city Was there any specific part or function the ECMADE that you found particularly difficult to use? % Yes No I don t know If yes please explain what (text) Eyes wide open El idioma Common place Los cambios de idioma Arquitectura Si, no me gustan los cambios de idioma Was it a pleasant experience to use the ECMADE? % Yes No I don t know Would you like to come back to ECMADE? % To visit the portal and get more information? 5 12 To visit the new exhibitions? To meet the community on a new chat

21 Test the website ECMADE ( and the exhibition for the Swedish Museum Architecture Target group: Students and pedagogical personnel 21/05/2004 Version 2.0 Ola Björemyr, More Business Media AB 21

22 0. Executive Summery The Swedish museum Architecture has developed a web portal ECMADE and where an exhibition developed together with Kalmar Museum and the Kulturen in Lund has been included. The exhibition mainly target ung people studying at the grammar school level and the gymnasium. The first version the web portal was launched in spring The Swedish museum Architecture has assigned More Business Media AB to make an evaluation the web portal and se what connections there are between this material regarding the users prile and points view and the usability and usefulness. The aim the study is to get further material for developing the web portal and the structure and content the design. The target group for the investigation was students at (mainly gymnasium) level and pedagogical personnel (teachers and pedagogical personnel at the county museums). The study was conducted with a questionnaire. The questionnaires were published during 27/04/ /05/2004. During this period the target groups were encouraged to respond to the questionnaire by getting a link which was sent out with e- mail. The target groups were students and pedagogical staff. Totally 300 addresses were supplied by the Swedish museum Architecture who also contacted a number schools which works in architecture and design and asked them to respond on the questionnaire. The reason for doing this was that it was difficult to get access to the students addresses security reasons. The questionnaire to students/pedagogical staff contained 17 mail to be able take part in a lottery on cinema tickets). questions (incl. a request to leave e- This type study with a target group with knowledge and an interest for the subject generally has very high response rate. Normally this type study has 5-15% respons rate, whiles a targeted investigation has higher respons rate (up to 50%). What is the issue is if the respondents have interest/belonging and if he/she will influence with his contribution. A reminder was sent out to the addresses within a week. Probably has the limited response time (10 days) and when the investigation was done (during exams time and May holiday) had influence on the response rate negatively. Further one aspect which influences the respondents rate is that it took some time to respond on the questionnaire as all respondents had to go into the portal first and then surf round on the web portal before they could reply on the questionnaire. Totally 42 students/pedagogical personnel responded. This means that the group students/pedagogical personnel had a response rate on 14 % which can be considered as good as it takes some work for all respondents to be able to answer the questionnaire. 22

23 1. How ten do you visit websites on the Internet? Comment (kommentar): Every day (varje dag) 57,43%, Once/many times per week (en/flera ggr/vecka) 19,80%, Once/many times per month (en/flera ggr/month) 1,98%, First time (första gången) 20,79% Almost 80% are users the Internet. In spring % used the Internet every day or once per week in Sweden so the population is more familiar with Internet compared with the normal population. 2. Are you interested design? Comments (Kommentar): 42 (svar) 95% were generally interested design. Yes 95,05%, Neither nor 4.95%. 23

24 3. Design can be a broad concept. Did you get a better concept design after visiting the website Comments (Kommentar): 42 (svar) Over 63% did get a better concept design after visiting the website The website really contributes to more knowledge on design. 4. How do you find the exhibition User friendliness: Comment (Kommentar): 41. Very good (mycket bra) and Good (bra) 70% Neither or (varken eller) 13%, Poor (dålig) and Very poor (mycket dålig) 17% The conclusion is that ECMADE consortium should develop and improve the website. 24

25 4.2 Information Comment (Kommentar): 41 respondents (svar) 85% are the opinion that the information is good or very good. Only 5% finds it poor and 5% very poor. This is a good score which shows the information has high quality. 4.3 Grafik Comment (Kommentar): 41 respondents (svar) A large number visiotors 74% (73) considers the graphic very good or good. Only 8% (8) considers it poor or very poor. The conclusion is that the graphic is satisfactory. 25

26 4.4 Experience Comment (Kommentar): 41 respondents (svar) 72% (71) the visitors considers the experience good or very good. Only 2% (2) considers the experience poor. The conclusion is that the website creates a positive experience for the person interested in design. 5. How do you find the exhibition Dimension design? 5.1 User friendliness Comments (Kommentar): 23 Visitors are very satisfied 29% (28) or very satisfied 38% (39) with the exhibition. 15% (15) finds it poor or very poor. 26

27 5.2 Information Comment (Kommentar): 41 (svar) The visitors consider the information good or very good 81% (79). Only 4% (4) finds it poor or very poor. It is a good grade for the quality on the information. 5.3 Grafik Comments (kommentar): 42 A large number the visitors find the graphic good or very good 78% (76). Only 8% (8) fins it poor or very poor. The comment is that a large group finds the graphic exiting but difficult to navigate. 27

28 5.4 Experience Comment (Kommentar): 42 Most visitors find the experience good or very good 75% (73). Only 8% ( 8) considers the experience poor or very poor. 28

29 6. Will you consider using the website when you teach in the school? Comment (Kommentar): Only xx respondents were teachers. Only 9% (9) will consider using the website in education whilst 13% will not use it. 38% are not certain. 7. You can publish own material on VISA eget material (show own material). Would you consider publishing own/student s material on the site? Comment (kommentar): 42 67% has responded that they may publish material on the web site. 33% answered no. 8. What do you experience most on the website ung.se? Summery The design and the graphic are ok. The content can be improved. The exhibition design-ung.se is ok. and on the 29

30 Comment (Kommentar):42 (svar) The overall impression is that most respondents are positive to the website. Many find it inspiring. A lot respondents have left comments. Designen på sidan samt informationen och bilderna. + grymmt snygg sida + Det är bra med info om design till unga men jag tycker att sidan kunde vara bättre. Tycker den var svår att navigera i och att det var för mycket intron och "snygg" grafik. Det blir lite för ytligt. +- Det bästa var under visa med Konstfack& Beckmans och Fantasi samt Inspiration - jättebra. Utställningar var av varienrande kvalitet Bostad i tiden var bra liksom Eyes wide open. + Bra skrivet om designprocessen.bra glimtar av designstudenter. + Dess existens. + Bra bilder och lättfattlig text. + bra med designhistoria och årtal + Informationen i sig verkade bra, men grafiken och navigationen var väldigt förvirrande och irrelevant. Krångla inte till det! (+)- Enkelt att hitta, fina bilder, intressant och roligt. + Roligt att ni samlat svensk design på detta sätt. Bra som en bas-guide till svensk design. Skulle dock önska att det fanns ännu mer bilder. + En bra idé att mot yngre människor förklara vad det innebär med formgivning. Dock håller den fortfarande för låg nivå. (+)- den fungerade inte jag kom inte vidare! - Lärarhandledningen + Inte tramsigt, tar besökarna på allvar. + Lagom mycket, relevant information. Även läströtta elever orkar ta det till sig. Bra bilder, såklart! + Logiskt uppbyggd, lätt att hitta, snygg grafik, intressanta rubriker (ja, innehållet också förstås!) + Att den var bra utformad + fina bilder. lagom med info. bra att man kan få reda på mer om man är intresserad. + Mycket snygg och spännande grafik. Inbjöd verkligen till fortsatt tittande. Jag brukar tröttna ganska fort på surfande men inte här. Grattis till en god sida! + Många exempelbilder och texterna var anpassade för en yngre publik. Intressant att man även tagit med planlösningar i översikten av boendet. + Möjlighet för unga att se och förstå vad design egentligen är och en mötesplats för utbyte av informatoin unga emellan. + Jag tyckte att textinformationen var bra och lagom mycket + Rolig grafik. Det är alltid roligt när man upptäcker en websidas oväntade möjligheter efter hand, att man överraskas, jag tänker tex. på att bildtexterna innehåller extra och bra information, när man klickar på ett visst ställe. + Väldigt mkt känsla av dataspel och det kanske är bra om man ska nå denna målgrupp...+- Kul och intressant, man kan vara anonym om man vill + Fina bilder + Att den lockade till att fortsätta titta. + Jag tyckte grafiken och designen på dennna hemsida var otroligt snygg, det har ni verkligen lyckats bra med! Sen tycker jag att det verkligen finns mycket information att hämta och mycket att lära sig av. Det känns som om det äntligen finns en plats för alla om design och att man kan få lära sig allting i lung och ro! Otroligt snyggt gjort! + snygg och bra sida helt enkelt! + att man fick reda på mycket fakta från grunderna vad design innebär + Jag tycker att hemsidan va väldigt bra. Den va snygg. Man kännder dock att det saknas "vägbeskrivning" på hemsidan ibland. Den snurrande kuben är bra och snygg. Man fattar efter första gången att kuber = knappar. tummen upp för kuben. "Design process" är välgjord. Bilderna som är med där skulle kunna användas tare i de vanliga menyerna. Samma stil av bilder alltså. man blir mer nyfiken av bilder än av text. Efter allt, sidan va bra, snygg relativt smidig men i alla högsta grad designig. + (-) Fräsht. Lagomt med information. Inspirerande (med bilderna på elevers arbeten och ideer. Tingen omkring oss" var mycket bra gjort, ser fram emot när alla poster är fullmatade. Gillade texterna. Lagom sparsmakade. + 30

31 Grafiken, mångfalden + Att studenter kan visa upp sina alster + Bra strukturerat, tydligt språk och bra bilder. + att den tar ett helhetsgrepp på designområdet på ett lättöverskådligt sätt. + kronologin var lätt att förstå, bra exempel bland bildmaterialet + Ger en snabb bra överblick över bra basfakta, historiken och omvärldssituationen och om mitt intresse inte redan var fångat så skulle jag definitivt bli det efter en rundtitt på denna site. Jag är snart färdigutbildad inredningsarkitekte vid Konstfack. + att man försökt göra en webbplats texterna utmärkta bildmaterialet ringa omfattning + Det är som en hel värld med massor av olika möjligheter att lära känna design och annat - man kan verkligen använda det som ett kabinettskåp! + Snygg design och grafik. Den utmanar att vidga var och ens syn på design, att design inte bara innebär att det ska vara snyggt osv. Plus att att den sporrar till eget arbete! Mycket positivt! Att det finns samlat på nätet. Material som går att fortsätta arbeta med. Mycket information och inspiration till fortsatt arbete. Jag gillar att det är mycket bilder att fästa sig vid. + Fick många tips och det var mycket inspirerande och intressant. + All kul information som ex att det var en lag i England som sa att prostituerade skulle bära något rött. mycket användbart för äldre barn som läser och kan söka på datorn. + Det var en mycket bra sida! Jag hade kul under hela tiden jag befann mig på den. Det finns fortfarande lite tekniska problem. Man blir utkastad på några ställen. Men som sagt... bra jobbat, kul sida, den kommer jag att använda! + (-) att jag kan använda den i undervisningen + att den inte är så statisk utan det finns en struktur och en rörelse som väcker nyfikenhet och som känns lite som att upptäcka världen + En samlad plats där man kann hitta formgivning/design från olika tidsepoker och få en uppfattning om förändring och utveckling av produkterna... Få en uppfattning om hur en produkt tas fram m.m. Jätte bra! + Positivt att den är fräsch. MEN den är fruktansvärt anonym, rörig och totalt oöverskådlig. Man förstår inte strukturen. Dåligt att man måste välja om man vill in på Se, Veta eller Visa. Man går in och man har ingen aning om var man är. Alla länkar är dolda. Om man är dyslektiker, blind, synskadad eller har andra funktionshinder gissar jag att man har stora problem. Webbplatsen har flera rörelse och förändrignseffekter som är totalt onödiga och som bara tar en massa tid. De kan kännas lite roliga första gången men man kommer att bli fullständigt galen om man ska ha denna webbplats som läromedel. Dessa effekter tillför ingenting i upplevelse eller förståelse. (+) - Väldigt lättnavigerad och stilren. + ljudet. men bilderna borde vara över hela sidan.. inte centrerade i mitten +- grafiken och upplevelsen + Det fanns bra med information och det var lätt att hitta det man ville se. + lätt tligänglidt och bra anpassat till ungdommen + vet inte Den var inte så mossig, som vissa andra sidor. + SNYGGT GJORT! + att den är speciellt anpassad för ungdommar + intesseväckande + bra gjort bra på olika sett + Arr den var så fin och lärorik. + All tillgänglig information + Det var bra länkar så att man hittade på webbplatsen bra och grafiken tyckte jag var bra med vissa undantag. + Jag tycker att det mest positiva med sidan är att man får mycket med information från alla delar av designen + Hyffsad enkel design. inte så kronglig. Lätt att hitta. + Vet inte riktigt. de var sådär lite små kul bara. + Det fanns otroligt mycket intressant att se och läsa om. Roligt att läsa om nya ideer som elever har gjort i olika skolor. Det fanns mycket information och en välkommnande sida. Tyvker själv att 31